Since I have ceased to be a regular associate of the “Gazeta Wyborcza” (I emphasize “constancy” due to the fact that I do not exclude guest performances), I am no longer bound by the obligations involved. I can yet compose the full fact about everyone!
In practice, it will only appear that since patron Matczak is no longer my friend from the breakers, I no longer gotta hide with my opinion of him. Of course, it can be guessed – who Peterson promotes, that I do not respect (joy!) – but I avoided its expression, especially erstwhile we all had a fight with the Law and Justice.
Besides, I don't think anything's gonna change. I've always been to the left of the mainstream editorial stream, so it would be weird if I stopped supporting the Parta Together AKURAT from the origin of Breaking Up with the "GW". In the second circular of the presidential election I will vote for Trzaskownia or Holowski due to the fact that I traditionally consider Antiscript to be the insignificant Evil.
Nor will I change my head about the origin of the problems of “Gazeta Wyborcza”. It wasn't the Law and Justice that choked her, it was the absurd decision to launch 2 competing websites on the net that readers don't distinguish. rather recently, the commionate Janek R. stated that he read in the “Election” interview of Sroczyński.
It's like Netflix started Flixnet, with akin content, but free. As in the Greek tragedy, it must end in a disaster, regardless of the hero's struggle.
This may have changed (let me remind you that I left my tenure and active activity in the relation 4 years ago, so I no longer have firsthand knowledge), but in my time this subject was an agor elephant in the room. Corpomenagers reacted to this subject like Ardryts to Ijon Tiche asking about sepulki.
Ah, let's leave it. Fortunately, I am afraid about this only as a reader despairing of the fall of Legend, not as a unionist who cares about being fired.
People who made this superb decision almost 20 years ago (and any equally successful ones) have long been outside of Agora. They flew off on gold parachutes, picked up briefings, and left employees with that bigos.
In writing and publishing circles, the thought of a book about the past of the "GW" has long been circulating, and I have even been approached respective times with specified a proposal. I said no due to the fact that as far as I know, that would be boring.
It's a communicative of mediocre decisions made by people whose names don't tell much. Banal, sad, boring.
In my opinion, there is besides no second bottom in the loud scandals. People were obsessing over the second bottom in Rywin or Maleszka's cases, and late Kącki, which, in my opinion, resulted from circular reasoning.
The starting point is the presumption that Agora is Almighty and guided by Outstanding Strategists. Therefore, it is impossible for anything to be the consequence of an accident, a mistake, a mess.
Oh, no! Everything had to be the superb Intrigue of Michnik, who, as is widely known, directs Agora.
If we accept this assumption, we will easy prove it. For any “silent text about insurgents” kind of trouble, you can make any elaborate “what Michnik wanted to achieve”. I've even seen conspiracy theories that Michnik created the Rywin affair for his benefit (only the fuck you don't know what).
I deny the very assumption. The "election" was never a political power, deciding the result of the elections – on the contrary.
I'll prove it to you as a presidential election. They give a snapshot of Polish politics equally all 5 years.
Let us mark P1 the fall of the candidate supported by the “Gazeta” already in the first round, P2 only in the second, and as the MNKK a defeat so massacred that little THAN THE FUCKING CORWIN!. BK is an ephemeral phenomenon of Bronisław Komorowski, who won despite the support of “Gazeta Wyborcza”.
Let's go. 1990: Mazowiecki, P1. 1995: Kuroń, P1. 2000: Olechowski, P1. 2005: MNKK Bochniarz. 2010: BK. 2015: Komorowski, P2. 2020: Trzaskowski, P2.
That is, on 7 cases 1 success, 2 almost-almost failures, “if not a pole, if not a bar”, 3 unappealed failures and 1 that ends with adjectives. The godson is out of scale.
The origin of this scope of disasters was the attachment of the “Gazeta” to the liberal wing of the post-solidarity camp, which initially played in the extraclass but even flew out of the territory league. There is simply a similarity between the 2 disasters.
It was besides a series of very stupid decisions made by very smart people. This awakened among the observers the belief that there must be a second bottom, a master gambit in 5D chess – due to the fact that the sly fox Geremek as he walks up the stairs is not known whether he enters or descends.
Support for the Platform came later and was married by reason. For the first 5 years, the "GW" has supported the ex-ROAD environment with all its strength, which automatically meant combating Tusk – competing for the same electorate.
There is no love in this relation to this day, as evidenced by this absurd casting for “the leader of the opposition”. It was expected to be the dreamy Prof. Rzepiński, already Mateusz Alimenteus, already Petru, this “Polish Kennedy”. Just anyone but Tusk.
I'm not any overly enthusiastic Tusk, but this endless casting always seemed like a waste of energy to me. The government does not object to the singing of Kaczmarski only by a majority of 231 votes, so it is natural that the leader of the opposition should be the leader of the strongest opposition group.
In short, if Tusk is memorable, he has something to remember “Gazecie”. And it is, so I don't believe in "government saves" scenarios.
Maybe the single journalists will catch up with the spokesperson, the manager or the ambassador. They're already getting caught. However, this does not aid “Gazeta”, on the contrary.
So I see the future wrong, but I see it this way for respective years, and “Gazeta Wyborcza” is inactive leaving. So possibly he can last the next one? There is no greater joy for the pessimist than to be mistaken in predictions.
