The text is long due to the fact that quite a few attention has been received to various commentators and analysts. And besides, it seems that the environment of the Incorrigible is moving towards the Correct, influenced by liberal propaganda, and I would like to inform against going in that direction and closing in my bubble.
If individual wants to polish, delight mention to the presented and present alternate thesis.
How to decently describe reality?
An analogy to language could be utilized for this purpose. A appropriate description would require a list of 3 elements: a pledge of grammatical rules, a dictionary from which the language selects the elements for the description and speech resulting from the activation of the description process combining grammar with the dictionary.
This process can be another way of putting puzzles according to certain algorithms. Puzzles can be arranged in different combinations, resulting in different images.
So in many interpretations of reality, I agree with the puzzle or presented phenomena, but I disagree with the method of putting them in the picture. Dictionary - yes, grammar - no.
For respective decades I have been following publications on socio-political issues and their civilisational conditions. In fresh weeks I have had my hands on a publication by Bartosz Kopczyński, entitled "A Guide to a Conscious Nation", whose thought I like, but in which I found a number of substantive errors. I will not be active in the detailed calculation of these errors, and alternatively I will mention to the phenomenon that is wider in the full country, which is reflected in this publication.
As for the facts and their consequences in the book, I have no objection. But if you look at the facts as a set of puzzles, you might find that these puzzles can be arranged differently and you get a different picture. So it may turn out that the explanation of the same facts may be different and give different results.
There is no substantive discussion in Poland. 1 vote of discussion does not make. And the deficiency of substantive discussion means the inability to make a credible, widely accepted image of the planet and make a appropriate effective strategy on the basis of it.
This is due to respective factors: the individualistic feature of the national character and the deepening individualism of the liberal-consumer system, which systematically generates dispersal.
There are various intellectual initiatives, but on a general basis each 1 does not interact. An example can be published respective years ago a great, breaking stereotypes work by Jonathan Haidt titled "Right Mind", devoted to the intellectual conditions of political attitudes. No discussion.
A fewer years ago, there was a collective work under the aegis of Prof. Dudek, entitled "Let's talk about Poland" presenting a alternatively bizarre concept resembling the territory division of Poland, this time according to the worldview, but the discussion did not spark.
Recently, the publication of "The Liberated Truth" by Katarzyna Obłąkowska, containing talks in prominent figures of Polish public life, and I fear that it can share the destiny of these mentioned above.
Marcin Piątkowski's work, originally published in English in Oxford, entitled "Golden Age", devoted to the spectacular success of Poland in fresh years, has not sparked the discussion.
The discussion should begin with fundamental issues, i.e. those concerning key elements of the civilization system. In this regard, it is evident that the social nature of man is ignored and the consequences of this nature.
If we are talking about life in general, we are taking into account the natural, physical space, which had an impact on the life of all species that had to face the challenges of this space. any organisms were built on a circular plan, preferring settled life, like various semblances, others on a two-sided plan, which required mobility, which in turn shaped the ability to control the environment, right, left, and stimulated the improvement of intelligence.
Just as physical space determines the form and function of various organs of the body, so besides social space determines the form of minds and social relationships and sets a permanent framework and directions of development. Let's item the word "permanent."
In the case of the human species, social space with its dimensions is involved, which shapes the structures of minds entering into continuous interactions in the social environment. The primary request for endurance of the species is cooperation within a group that requires cognitive development, due to the fact that 1 needs to be aware of the characteristics of the partners, requires the improvement of emotional relationships and bonds between partners, and willful improvement that allows to establish its place within the group structure.
In this way, we get a model of social structure in human civilization, whose main elements/relationships are, briefly, truth, love and freedom. The combinations of these relationships and their strength let to classify types of civilization. For our needs it is worth pointing out the Chinese civilization and comparing it to the Christian civilization in which the component of individual freedom appeared absent in another civilizations. There is no way to describe the success of the West without considering the fundamental function of Christianity
Speaking of Christian civilization, there is simply a question of the essential consideration in the discussion of spiritual themes. However, it must be remembered that only a description of certain features of a religion can be taken into account in the discussion, but arguments based on individual beliefs related to religion must be excluded, due to the fact that discussions involving people with different beliefs should only concern scientificly verifiable issues.
For the same reason, ideological beliefs should be excluded.
The question of doctrine should besides be left out, due to the fact that the interdisciplinary conclusions of circumstantial sciences must be taken into account.
The liberals besides gotta ignore the principles of evolution. The human species has clearly evolved towards intense cooperation, so it is possible to talk about natural regularity and the resulting natural rights. Evolution promoted beneficial qualities, eliminating disadvantages. Liberals act as if they have forgotten this by negating the advantages of the tradition thus created and promoting things contrary to the direction of evolution.
The fundamental model of civilization is modified in different national or state systems. And each strategy has 2 components: individuals and society. In view of the primacy of the social factor, careful consideration must be given to the analysis of a strategy whose individual is an element. Only a Christian civilization provides comparative autonomy to the individual.
The liberal-consumer system, which evolved on the basis of Christianity, has committed to favouring 1 dimension - individual freedom - towards another dimensions. Absolute freedom has marginalized the truth, and freedom has stimulated the emotional factor, resulting in dispersal and contradictions in the system, and lies, hatred and force have become dominant. Thus, as you can see, as a consequence of certain processes and mechanisms, the Western model of civilization was disturbed.
One origin in this disorder was the recently acquired cognition of the function of emotion. So far, emotions have been regarded, rather absurdly, as a negative origin affecting the lives of individuals and society, and fresh investigation has proved their crucial function in shaping motivation and decision-making. And this cognition can be utilized for political manipulation.
Therefore, we request to be aware that social reality is complex, multi-wart and in all layer there may be different conditions and principles, while the monolithic influence of the key foundations of civilization.
Spectacular evidence of ignorance leading to the replacement of a reliable analysis of the complex structure of reality and its replacement with conspiracy theories is the issue of the economical consequences of liberalism, which manifest themselves as creating a consumerist economy alternatively of capitalism. The influential financial-banking sector has come to the floor, which has changed the rules and introduced the rule of money creation, lending and marketing to make artificial needs that are exacerbating the constant economical situation.
Analysts ignore the fact that this creates a financial pyramid, and the blowing of artificial needs has disastrous social consequences leading to social partitionation, dispersal and anomaly, due to the fact that the community structure is disappearing. The liberal strategy collapses and the consumer economy is unsustainable, due to the fact that although it proved to be individually beneficial in a narrow sense, it is socially destructive at the same time. And since the consumer economy is not sustainable, then there is besides a level of consumption. Unfortunately, conspiracy theories appear here alternatively of reliable analysis.
Conspiracy theories emerging as a consequence of unwillingness to follow social trends and technological investigation give a deceptive sense of certainty, distract us from knowing the actual human nature and make dangerous illusions preventing us from identifying and controlling real processes.
Determinants are clear and clear limits within which these determinants work. All interpretations of socio-political phenomena must take account of these fundamental elements of social space.
Such anthropological concept is simply a prerequisite in interpreting reality and its layers. Without this concept, various and diverse social phenomena can be treated as puzzles, from which fantastic stories about human past can be arranged. As a result, conspiracy theories or stories about alien intervention popularized by Daeniken are being created.
The human species lives in an evolutionaryly shaped social space and has reached an unheard level of inventiveness, nevertheless subject to acute rigors of cooperation, which force a clear uniformity of ideas and behaviour. Without knowing this fact, excavated remnants of ancient or prehistoric civilizations are considered evidence of alien interference as is the case in the case of cognition of the cosmos in the primary tribes, or are simply ignored as incompatible with the dominant strategy of human past as the case of an Indian city resembling a modern-day wellcare state.
People across the globe face akin challenges, and due to the fact that they have akin intellectual qualities, they find akin solutions. People from akin backgrounds, of akin origins, like contact with akin ones, and avoid contact with strangers culturally, due to the fact that transaction costs are lower. There is something like the natural tendency of complex systems to self-organize and decay.
However, this evolved species unity and a large dose of determinism are conducive to the creation of various illusions.
This form of illusion is popular in any environments to believe that there is simply a Plan for the Acquisition of Civilization. Certain apparent similarities are regarded as conscious intent. In order to accomplish this intention, the human species would should be divided into 2 parts, 1 part of which would have much more cognition than the rest, it would should be organizationally separated, structurally from the rest, and most importantly it would should be subject to different evolutionary, social mechanisms than the dominated rest, which is apparent nonsense.
This illusion finds various forms of expression, and 1 of them is the belief that there is simply a hidden, secret planet government, to which the news of the Bilderberg Group meetings or meetings in Davos contributes. These illusions go on to the agenda over information on divergent, incompatible interests of different states and changes in the policies of various global organisations, which undergo constant fluctuations.
The deficiency of adequate anthropological concepts makes specified popularity a story of the power of the Jews.
It is clear that the Jews have gained a considerable advantage over another nations, but the reason for this advantage must be understood. Since judaic communities are scattered around the world, they have direct access to the achievements of different nations and countries. The elites of individual countries are not very eager to cooperate with each other, while Jews inhabiting them motivated by spiritual and cultural solidarity do not betray and benefit from the achievements of different cultures. This makes their possible disproportionate. This is peculiarly evident in the diamond trade in which it counts
tribal solidarity and lower transaction costs allowing Jews to dominate. 1 cannot be amazed that Jews usage their assets politically and businessally.
Let us take the behaviour of Poles in the United States as proof. While another nations show solidarity in contact with the American authorities, Poles - as the news carries - study on 1 another in the United States.
In Poland, due to historical events in the form of abroad occupations, national solidarity is in mediocre condition, but there are many examples of dirty group solidarity, the best example of which is the post-communist arrangement. And this arrangement is readily utilized by outside forces. This arrangement is not, as any would imagine, a formalized knowing of dark forces, but a consequence of random adjustments of people with akin interests and akin social origins and a circumstantial relation to social values.
Let's not get crazy. False easy theories lead us astray.
This is how, in a nutshell, I feel about this publication, limited to the presentation of the correct methodology for interpreting social phenomena. A complete analysis would require a separate book.
Because the author put forward the task of pointing out and correcting errors, he divided the book into 55 lessons. Any lesson would require leaving a layer of facts, but it would be essential to re-interpret the relation between facts. Take the issue of the emergence and improvement of hypersexualization.
People have always been curious in the issue of male-female relationships, but possibly the era in which primacy belonged to the heroes of homery. There was chivalry poetry, then literature appeared with short stories on the cant of the peripety of the hearts of the heroes, and specifically indicating - the heroine, and erstwhile the economy and women developed became employees and customers, they began to be curious in fashion and beauty to increase their chances in the matrimony market. In this way, the phenomenon of diffusion of cultural patterns within Western civilization was average for culture.
When the liberal concept of unlimited freedom came to the fore, and the improvement of pharmacology produced contraceptives, and erstwhile consumptionistic debauchery and social dispersal occurred, the only common denominator of social control was human biological sexuality and as a consequence appeared in the media, in advertising and marketing universal hypersexuality. And in the end, even this biological sexuality was challenged by genderism. These were the natural mechanisms of phenomena. Not conspiracy, but intellectual stupidity and cognitive errors and business interests, which, however, can be utilized for their own purposes.
A thorough analysis of adverse phenomena, diagnosis and then presentation of remedies requires the creation of a model of the social space of the human species, then based on this model of the creation of a model of civilization, in our case Christian and the recognition of socio-political systems that arose as modifications based on this model of civilization.
In our case, it turns out that we are dealing with a liberal-consumer strategy with its circumstantial drawbacks in the form of mechanisms that disrupt social processes. The main drawback is to base the strategy on 1 relation - freedom, which absolutisation creates certain harmful phenomena and triggers harmful processes.
It is worth pointing to the illusion of attempts to marginalize Christianity and the belief that a modern society without Christianity can be created. Therefore, it is so crucial to survey the mechanisms that started Christianity, and without which it can be assumed with absolute certainty that the collapse of civilization will occur. These mechanisms can be scientifically studied and described without referring to arguments from religion that unbelievers cannot convince. But there's no specified research.
Renowned scientists specified as Prof. Robin Dunbar cannot ignore the function of religion in their analyses of social life, but the conclusions it draws are shy due to political correctness. Nevertheless, if anyone wants to preserve Western civilization, he must undertake a far-reaching survey of the relation between the mechanisms imposed by Christianity and their social effects.
A systemic approach to social phenomena is besides important. Systemic systems make on the basis of any attractive idea, ideas gain more and more supporters, become widely accepted beliefs based on institutions, customs, laws and social structures based on them. Systems are created naturally erstwhile people negotiate, come to an agreement, contain compomises, and make solidifying structural systems. But the historical process continues, any phenomena accumulate in this structure and change, interests change and the strategy is undermined, rejected and replaced by others. So in the case of the strategy there are 2 phases: in the first, people form the system, and then the strategy shapes people. So it is unnecessary to game that someone, any hidden decision-making body, directs social processes.
Finally, I will point to the Achilles heel of this publication. Well, at the end of that is the bibliography. It just so happens that the names of this bibliography are flicking naphthalene and are completely inconsistent with the resources of my private library covering the latest publications on technological issues from widely understood anthropology.
