Card. Shockingly, the "partner unions". Does the Church declare surrender?

The Church will not interfere with the legislative work in Parliament on the partnership task proposed by Katarzyna Kotula. – I think the Church will give her opinion at most – assessed the card. Kazimierz Nycz on Polsat News, introducing in amazement a multitude of Catholics, regular bravely fighting for the dignity of human life, respect for household life and the safety of their children. Does not the shepherd of the Catholic Church see the dangers of gradually disarming ourselves in front of our eyes, protected even in the Constitution, the institution of marriage?

Card. Kazimierz Nycz, asked by Bogdan Rymanowski about whether the Church would support the task on partnerships, stressed that in his opinion "The Church will give its opinion in any sense". – I think the Church will give her opinion at most. He will not interfere in legislative work in Parliament. The temperature of this discussion in the Sejm shows that the problem is not so simple – he said.

However, the Warsaw Metropolitan indicated the boundary condition of tolerance. It is incomparably between the partnerships and another relationships with the marriage, and even more so with the sacramental union. – If there's a ellipse of people for whom even the alleged civilian contract in the civilian State Office is besides much, they would like a relation that's more consensual and resolving, then any tolerance to specified views must be from the Church – he said.

The Warsaw Metropolitan seems to have a naive belief that the expression of relationships proposed by the left will not be compared with marriage, so... in this form it can be tolerated. Only that the left-wing “tolerance” will never stop. The intent of revolutionaries is, after all, to "equal" – to advance not only ‘homo’ but ‘gener’ (and who knows what another ideas the imagination of revolutionaries will encounter) and give them peculiar protection and privileges, including the right to adopt children.

Does not the shepherd of the Catholic Church see the danger of disarming the institution of matrimony before our eyes? And that's what happens erstwhile we agree to a partnership. This is the first step to align them with marriage. It's just a substance of time and further inactivity, I'm sorry, tolerance to ideological pranks.

But the disastrous effects of the gradual "qualification of rights" are not all that the Catholic must see in the intentions of revolutionaries. After all, the desire to have the offspring of single-sex relationships is supported by the full cruel surrogacy industry, which goes hand in hand with "clinics" in vitro. The examples from the West show that left-wing authorities have no problem picking up children born in conventional families to give care over them to all kinds of sex unions.

And that's not a guess. These are the real effects observed in societies that have come to the way of “equality”, or demolition of the family.

There is 1 more question to ask: What is the meaning of “tolerating” partnerships, which the cardinal himself calls easy dissolved? Politicians can find for themselves what effect the promotion and release of the destructive virus into the basic social tissue, which is now traditionally understood by the family. I hear we're fighting the demographic crisis. I hear we have a plague of depression, including among young people. What will add fuel to the fire? After all, the perceived impermanence of these compounds will be specified a destructive fuel.

So why does the Church see the “sign of today” – as the hierarch himself says – which shows that people increasingly do not want to commit themselves for life, that “everything is fast, everything is to be suddenly, unexpectedly, everything moves like in this proverbial TikToku”, lays down arms? Why is he surrendering? How do we realize the declaration of the Warsaw metropolitan? That the Church is only expected to watch how tictocisation and tinderization of social life progress? Is he expected to tolerate specified practices? In another words, is he expected to tolerate sin, just to make this moral swamp legally equal to marriage? O tempora, o moresOh, my God!

Marcin Austyn

Paweł Lisicki, Grzegorz Górny and Krystian Kratiuk spoke about why the alleged partnerships should be opposed in the program "I, Catholic. Extra". We encourage you to watch the program:

See also:

What is truly the "partnerships" Act? Let us not be deceived by government euphemisms!