The most crucial origin of the triumph of Dr. Karol Nawrocki is the intellectual advantage of the clergy. Elect's election run was conducted with a view to the 2nd round. Prior to the first round, the pigs tried not to alienate any group of possible electorate. In addition, we can see that they were counting on flows: built candidates specified as Mentzen, Braun, Jakubiak will gain percentages that will vote for Nawrocki in the second round. Hence his score in the first round, which was lower than the PiS polls.
Nawrocki developed during the run and was getting better and had a coherent message. The message was positive.
And that's fundamentally all about Nawrock. I can besides add that he went to debates, but these are not patrons. The candidate goes to debates, that's the essence of the thing, and that's his role. The form of the run and election was decided by Trzaskowski and his staff (a group of sidekicks). There'll be a lot more about him.
II
If Trzaskowski was sitting there and telling me he was cool, that he made a good footbridge, and if you vote for him, you're cool, too, he'd win. This is not as certain as in Komorowski's case, which in 2015 had 2 word in his pocket, however. Meanwhile, he's the 1 who lost, not Nawrocki.
Rafał surrounded by specified intellects as Nitras, Nowacka had no chance of leading a meaningful campaign. Toothless, Joński, Zembaczyński besides moved there. I'm asking you, who was expected to do that? You mean campaign? Therefore, it is not amazing to copy Komorowski's 2015 run through the following elements: reluctance to debate, not to participate in debates. Trzaskowski going to the Republic would show that he is suitable. That in a situation where he doesn't know the questions, he can slay. Even if he can't number on a area with a psychologist. But he can't do that. He can't. Unlike Nawrocki, he went to the alleged TVP in liquidation.
Trzaskowski imitated Komorowski's snout as opponents. any hen specialist, etc. specified stunts by Trzaskowski are shown in the media. But the chaos of the message is more important. Various volts. In 2020, Trzaskowski promised to go to the independency March, then tried to ban it, etc. He followed the rainbow agenda in short terms. I don't realize why he didn't stick to it consistently, but he started talking about the catechist who formed it. Why did he start acting like a pig? The march of patriots etc. Beer with Mentzen invalidated the leading communicative about Fascism that is in force there. The Confederacy is fascists worse than pigs, and here's a beer. Even given the dialectical habits of a totalized electorate accustomed to jerking off, it was besides much. I feel that Trzaskowski and the staff see each case separately. They do not realize the existence of alleged side effects, which links them to Komorowski's heritage.
This heritage is besides a talk of harmony. If Trzaskowski wants permission, then let him back off and give support to Nawrock, then everyone will vote for him and there will be no division. ExPBK did not give specifics here, nor did Trzaskowski. The explanation here is simple and it is the doctrine of balance: we do 1 thing and we say the other. We're going to a sharp division combined with dehumanization, degradation, demolishment, and destruction, but in order not to look so bad, we say no. And there's nothing going on. Here's another example of Tusk talking about economical nationalism. The side effects of this schizophrenia are serious: Tusk turns out to be a three-by-three person, and things are going their way. The regime's apparatus doesn't number for Tusk's words, which appear to be wrongful.
The symbol of the Trzaskowski run is the call from Demagog, who was to check 60 apartments per year. Warsaw gives 60 municipal housing units a year and Trzaskowski did not know about it and requested a check. This is simply a multifaceted embarrassment. Trzaskowski had a tendency to hit with feiknius, e.g. with Stanowski. No 1 saw it coming, and it just kind of went away. It ate, it ate, but it died.
Trzaskowski's main problem, however, was the negative campaign, i.e. feiknius whales. The revelations announced just before the election are poorly received by us and this is simply a conclusion from the empire. In addition, you can see this: if you accuse individual for example 10 affairs and 7 turns out to be false and 3 real people do goal classifications here and exits 7:3 for the talked-out. We had a condo around which they didn't build a coherent narrative. That's how she started coming out of the communicative that Nawrocki wanted to keep Grandpa from being homeless. Grandpa lived in this hut until the court decided that he was incapable to function alone. Then they changed and started talking about Nawrocki, but he helped criminals.
We inactive have speeches addressed to the motors and the fundamental electorate. Meanwhile, the specificity of the presidential election is that you request 50 percent and 1 vote and you request to scope different groups of voters. And they should not be discouraged by fanaticism. Meanwhile, there comes the panicked Tusk (who already knew) and supports Muranski.
People without gross intellectual deficits are able to analyse the message and measure whether we are facing allegations or innuendos. It's like Muranski's repeating something after someone. Onetu editors went to Tusk saying only an idiot would thin on Muranski.
III
Nawrocki was able to scope different groups due to the fact that it's the truth, but not the whole. Not to say completely contradictory content depending on the recipient. Tusk led leftist writer Otoka-Frąckiewicz who convinced a group of skeptical voters towards Kaczor. He claims that Nawrocki broke his leash and would be independent, and developed a fresh social doctrine.
Trzaskowski led to the open support of Nawrocki by Braun and Mentzen. Even Korwin-Mikke supported Nawrocki. Michalkiewicz supports in 2 rounds of pens in general, so it is not a revelation.
These are the most crucial insights, and for now I'm finished due to the fact that I'd gotta compose a book. Why Ziemkiewicz is right and incorrect is another interesting problem that will describe...
