The fabricated trial with Archbishop Carl Maria Vigan revealed who was who. Who is on the side of the overt heretic Bergoglio, and who is on the side of Christ and truth, or on the side of Archbishop Vigano.
The Patriarchate responds to media reports.
Historian Roberto de Mattei said: "Biskup Joseph Strickland recognized the authority of Pope Francis, refusing to follow the advice of these American conservatives and traditionalists who called on him to argue the pope's decision".
video:]]>https://vkpatriarhat.org/en/?p=22093]]>]]>https://bandera-de-cristo.wistia.com/medias/8uvwecdii3]]>]]>https://bcp-video.org/en/fabricated-process/]]>]]>https://cos.tv/videos/play/54023788461069312]]>]]>https://rumble.com/v56bpoz-fabricated-process.html]]>]]>https://youtu.be/9D0Z8Y-stPo]]>
Historian de Mattei is right, Bishop Strickland has truly acknowledged and continues to admit the authority of the false pope Francis as the legitimate pope, even now, after the release of the "Fiducia supplicans". Thus he became united with his apostasy and rebellion against God. It is absurd to invoke the alleged obedience of the Holy Father. Bergoglio, who excluded himself from the Church, cannot be his head, as confirmed by holy fathers and teachers of the Church.
De Mattei further refers to the Constitution of Pastor aeternus: "However, erstwhile the Pope makes decisions on the discipline and management of the Church, not exceeding God's and natural law, it is not a work to oppose, but to obey..."
However, in the case of Bergoglio, decisions are not taken without direct violation of divine and natural law. He had already crossed it in “Amoris laetitia”, where he practically invalidated God’s commandments and denied the existence of objectively binding moral standards. God’s law is replaced by a subjective approach. The dogmatic declaration “Fiducia supplicans” de facto invalidates the full Decalogue. In “Ad theology promovendam” he introduced the rule of changing paradigms with the provision that what is contrary to that is invalid. In doing so, he nullified both Scripture and Tradition. It follows that it is simply a sacred work to disobey and argue the decision of the apostate Bergoglio.
Quote of Bishop Schneider: "There is no authority to declare whether the elected and mostly accepted pope is an illegal pope".
With this statement, Schneider points out that for him, aside from the apostate Bergoglio There is no authority – neither the authority of Scripture, nor the authority of Tradition, or holy fathers and teachers of the Church, which made clear that the heretic pope is excluded from the Church and so cannot be its head. St. Bellarmin states: “This is besides written by St. Jerome, adding that the another sinners are excluded from the Church by the conviction of excommunication, while heretics cast themselves out and by their own action separate themselves from the Body of Christ... A non-Christian in no way can be a pope... He can't be the head of a body he's not even a associate of. He who is not a Christian is not a associate of the Church – and a public heretic is not a Christian, as clearly taught by Saint Cyprian (lib. 4, epist. 2), Saint Athanase (ser. 2 vs. Arian), Saint Augustine (lib. De grat. Christ., chapter 20), Saint Hieronim (Dial. contra Lucif.) and others; therefore, an open heretic cannot be Pope."
The Scriptural message is clear: “He who preaches another gospel, let him be excluded, cursed – anatema’ (Ga 1,8-9).
Schneider quote: "The constant practice of the Church makes it apparent that even in a situation of invalid choice, specified invalid choice would be de facto repaired by universal acceptance of the recently elected by the overwhelming majority of cardinals and bishops."
However, if a heretic is elected, this choice, according to Paul IV's dogmatic bull, is invalid, even if it was elected unanimously by all cardinals. The bull further states that everything this heretic does is irrelevant and ineffective.
In this situation, recourse to the constant practice of the Church is inadequate due to the fact that there has never been specified a situation in past erstwhile the alleged pope in his doctrinal declaration established a blessing to heaven crying sin of sodomy or erstwhile the pope publically consecrated himself to Satan.
Schneider quote: “In the case of Pope heretics, too, he would not lose his office automatically...”
That message by Schneider indicates either his ignorance or his deliberate deception.
The interpreters of the Wertz and Vidal ecclesiastical Codex derive from the dogmatic bull "Cum ex apostolates officio", from the teachings of fathers specified as St Cyprian, St Athanase, St Augustine, St Jerome, and church teachers specified as St Bellarmin (1610), St Francis Salezy (1622), St Bishop Antoni (1459), St Alfons Liguori. In the explanation of canon law of 1943, these church lawyers explain that: "As a consequence of the widely known and openly proclaimed heresy, the Pope of Rome, if he falls into heresy, is considered consequently to be deprived of jurisdiction even before any declarative judgement of the Church."
Schneider quote: “...and there is no body in the Church to declare that (Pope, outrightheretic) lost its office due to heresy".
St. Bellarmin says: ‘Therefore, the actual opinion is that the Pope, who is an open heretic, automatically ceases to be a pope and head, as he automatically ceases to be a Christian and a associate of the Church; and for this reason he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the opinion of all the holy fathers of the Church, who teach that the manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction, especially the opinion of St Cyprian."
Schneider claims that in the present alleged Church There's no body that would say so-called The pope lost his office due to heresy. This proves that today's Church is occupied by a sect of Bergoglians, which took all the key places. Schneider is the apologist of this cult. In fact, he rejects the alleged "Fiducia supplicans", but at the same time submits to the author, thus actually accepting the "Fiducia supplicans".
Quote of historian de Mattei: "Bishop Schneider follows St. Alfons Liguori's teaching here".
Schneider doesn't follow teaching.St. Alfons of Liguori. St. Alfons expressed as follows:: "If God had allowed the pope to become a notorious and audacious heretic, by virtue of this fact he would have ceased to be Pope, and the Holy See would have been abandoned (sede vacante)".This is entirely about Jorge Bergoglio.
Quote of historian de Mattei: "Bishop Schneider follows the teaching of Cardinal Billot and the Roman school of theology, according to which 1 who is widely accepted as Pope, He's a actual Pope.It’s okay. ”
If anyone is widely accepted as Pope, it is assumed that under no circumstances is it outright A heretic. PublicThe heretic does not belong to the Church even as a member, as St. Bellarmin writes: “Pope, who is an open heretic, automatically ceases to be Pope and head, just as it automatically ceases to be a Christian and a associate of the ChurchIt’s okay. ” The same is actual of holy fathers and teachers of the Church.
Quote of historian de Mattei: "...because if the full Church adhered to the false pope, then he would adhere to the false regulation of faith."
OCurrent We're witnessing it now. False Pope Brings Under False Principles of Faith the full Catholic Church, all who adhere to it, transforming the Church into the antiquities of fresh Age. Bergoglio even publically admits in his motu proprio "Ad theologiam promovendam" that it changes the basic paradigms, i.e. establishes False Principles of Faith. Thus again proves that he is indeed a false pope
Quote of historian de Mattei: “...you can isolate many words or deeds of Pope Francis and show that they are objectively not directed at the welfare of souls. However, there are besides another acts of this pontificate that do not have specified characteristics (for example, the announcement of 8 December 2020).. The Year of Saint Joseph)’.
Historian de Mattei must be joking. If he's serious, he just constructs artificial intellectual problems. At the same time, however, he completely ignores the fundamental reality of wickedness in a holy place, apostasy at the highest church office. Again, on 1 November 2023, Bergoglio issued a motu proprio "Ad theologiam promovendam", thus establishing the rule of changing the paradigm. He then issued a doctrinal declaration “Fiducia supplicans”, in which he legalized the dense sin of sodomy and established its blessing. Thus he de facto nullified the Decalogue and Credo and converted the Catholic Church into an antiquity of fresh Age. The fundamental fact that Bergoglio turned out to be outright Heretic, de Mattei completely ignores.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano points to the heresies and crimes of Bergoglio. According to the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and the Fathers of the Church, he is not an crucial pope. In his statements de Mattei grossly slanders the rightful archbishop, with the aim of destroying this main witness of Christ. And present the Lord Jesus would gotta say Roberto de Mattei: “Woe to you, Pharisees, hypocrites, viper tribe, that you are cutting off mosquitoes, swallowing camels, not yourselves entering the kingdom of God, and hindering others.” (cf. Mt 23,23n)
The Italian portal “La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana” has besides proved to be unimportant, full of unreliable conspiracy theories. An example is the gross manipulation and vile slander of the rightful Archbishop of Vigano. Who So Is that a portal? A hypocritical writer late released another gossipWhen he wrote: "For respective months now, information has been circulating about the re-consecration to be given to Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, erstwhile Apostolic Nuncio in Washington".
The conspirator, wishing to find an argument to confirm his theory, wrote that he addressed Archbishop Vigano, who reacted only with surprise why Bussola turned to him. Namely, the portal keeps getting dirty. However, as a surprise, the writer concluded that his game was confirmed. We don't want to analyse here. meanness, hypocrisy and manipulation of the ‘Nuova Bussola’ commits to destruct the fact itself and defend the way of lies and apostasy, we will confine ourselves to a brief summary: ‘Bussola“ uses mainstream media methods – Lies, lies, and lies.
Schneider wrote: "I am sorry that Archbishop Vigano uses offensive terms".
Archbishop Vigano does not usage offensive terms, on the contrary, he calls things by name, according to the Scriptures. Jesus besides spoke very hard about the Pharisees, calling them a viper tribe, snakes, whitewashed tombs, and hypocrites.Schneider does not separate between the chief things, namely that Archbishop Vigano guides people to the way of fact and repentance, and thus to salvation, while the false Pope Bergoglio guides people through heresy and sodomy to eternal condemnation. And that's a diametric difference.
According to Schneider Bergoglio, he most likely uses respectful expressions erstwhile he commits blasphemy and claims that the Lord Jesus allegedly“He has become a serpent and a devil to us.” Bergoglio grossly slandered Archbishop Vigano, calling him “the accuser of the brothers” and "the servant of Satan." But Schneider's not sorry.
Media quote: "The Brotherhood of St. Pius X on 24 June distanced itself from Archbishop Vigano and adds: Archbishop Vigano in his text powerfully advocates sedeswacantism. In another words, in his opinion, Pope Francis is not Pope... In this respect Archbishop Lefebvre and his fraternity would not agree."
Mons. Lefebvre, on the another hand, could not agree with the current position of the Brotherhood. Bishop Williamson, whom Monsignor Lefebvre ordained, unlike the Brotherhood, shares the same position as Archbishop Vigano, namely that Bergoglio is not an crucial pope. Archbishop Lefebvre would surely have taken this position. But as the conflicting Brotherhood expelled Bishop Williamson, so present they would have expelled Archbishop Lefebvr.
Media quote: "However, St. Pius X's fraternity recognizes Pope Francis as outstanding The pope... Bishops and Fraternity priests celebrate Holy Mass in unity with the Holy Father.”
If Bishops and Fraternity Priests They celebrate Holy Mass in interior unity with the alleged Holy Father Even after 18 December 2023, they accept the heresy "Fiducia supplicans". Then God besides falls upon them according to Ga 1.8, which Jorge Bergoglio brought upon him, and they service Liturgie no longer! The priest who accepted the Sodomic anti-evangelist besides accepted the spirit of the Antichrist. The spirit of the Antichrist cannot consecrated.
How did Archbishop Vigano comment on the present fabricated trial?
"I want to make it clear that I did not go to the Vatican (20 or 28 June)... I did not hand over any message or paper in my defence due to the fact that I do not admit its power, I do not admit the authority of its prefect, and I do not admit the authority of the individual who appointed it."
+ Elijah
Patriarch of Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate
+ OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
bishops-secretaries
02. 07. 2024
