The announcement of the result of the presidential election is not the final, but the beginning of the dispute with the inauguration of the presidency in the background, led by the ruling KO government in the context of the pending inauguration of the presidency of non-governmental supporters of Nawrocki.
Comments on the result of the presidential election on both sides of the political scene are not silent. Leftist-liberal opponents of Nawrocki are arguing about this more contributed to Trzaskowski's loss, or who was little active in promoting his candidacy, and who even harmed, like the author of the message "what harms promise" in the context of the 8 commitments signed by Trzaskowski in Mentzen's set.
The overactive Gierty is not idle and is on the way of a conspiracy, according to him perverting the consequence of the presidential election. Giertych wind electoral machlojka which according to him happened by comparing the results of Trzaskowski and Nawrocki with I turn and with II turn. In addition to any apparent mistakes of the chairmen of the committees consisting of assigning votes to Trzaskovsky Nawrock and vice versa, as in the case of the country's most celebrated peripheral commission No. 95 in Krakow, in which there was no typical of the election committee Karol Nawrocki, the majority of the differences in the number of votes from I and II circular of elections were limited to respective votes. For Giertych, even the difference of 1 little voice cast on Trzaskowski between I and II is the basis for forming a charge of sPiSkowa electoral manipulation.
Meritically poor, but propagandaally effective, as the recipients of the message do not get into item and consciousness is printed with the communicative "electoral forgery deprived Trzaskowski of his presidency". This may be useful for the mobilisation of the Trzaskowski electorate for speeches delaying the inauguration of the presidency of Karol Nawrocki, which can be highly crucial for the rulers.
The right-wing commentators rightly celebrate the election success of Karol Nawrocki and prepare for the inauguration of his presidency on 6 August, however, intoxicated by the success of not noticing the risks of this inauguration.
The Polish PL1.tv Press Salon, an overview of the events of the week premiered on June 6th, announced: “Trump stopped Tusk's coup on presidential elections in Poland?!” A title, fortunately, with a question mark. On the question of Marcin Roli, “Can there be anything about the fact that Donald Trump truly blocked the coup, in fact, Tuska in Poland?”, commenting on the events of the week Marek Skowroński of Realu24.tv replied, “Yes, of course”.
The unanimous consequence of ed.M. Skowronski does not take into account the multivariantity of the preparation of the ruling responses to the adverse result of the elections not ending with the resignation of the run to competition the election consequence just after the election consequence was announced. We inactive have quite a few opportunities to "stack", whatever that means in asking Marcin Rola.
The first option which had the chance to happen immediately after the announcement of the results of the election was to be a replay invented by the European Shield of Democracy of Romanian gameplay, which was to invalidate the adverse result of the election on the charge of external interference attributed to Russia.
The plan for Polish elections, unfortunately for the ruling, was exposed after Virtual Poland revealed that interference was carried out by the ruling Action Democracy led by Jakub Kocian, trained by the government-led NASK agency, keeping at least in its name – the technological and Academic Computer Network – the appearance of independence.
The action picanterie adds the fact that the financing of actions of the Action Democrats interfering online in the election had indeed a abroad source, but not from the Russian side only from the US Democratic organization supporting financially the promotion of the candidacy of Trzaskovsky and the defamation of Nawrocki and Mentzen candidatures.
Editor Marek Skowroński at the Polish Press Salon provides for perturbations on the way to the inauguration of the presidency of Karol Nawrocki through the hold of the Marshal Holown with the convening of the National Assembly, during which the swearing-in of Karol Nawrocki as president of Poland would take place. It's real.
However, editor Skowroński omits a full scope of another options of actions delaying the inauguration of the presidency of Karol Nawrocki, which the rulers have. He is moving besides lightly over the fundamental contention of Adam Bodnar's mines with SN president Margaret Manowska on the legality of the transportation of judgments by the home of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs and the opinion of the TEU spokesperson cited by him, who had already sent a signal in April to the rulings that, in the event of the approval of the “democratic” result of the elections by the contested IKNiSP SN, they could number on the rejection of that verdict by the TEU.
Well, honourable editor Mark Skowronski, there is simply a truly fundamental clash of lovers of EU federalization focused around and in the governing Citizens' Coalition under the banners of the "fighting democracy" which are insoluble conflict with the organization representing opponents of EU federalization of Polish legislation.
The rulers, despite losing the election, are aware of the number of masses supporting their actions, even on the basis of Trzaskovsky's election consequence close to Nawrocki's score and this dares them.
Minister Adam Bodnar, aware of the comparability of the number of coalition supporters of the government and opponents, cannot, without blinking, accept the verdict of the home of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, as he would compromise the full line of conduct and decisions taken by the GO government in the area of the regulation of law, based on the negation of the improvement of the judiciary introduced by Mr Zbigniew Ziobra.
On the another hand, the president of SN Małgorzata Manowska does not have the anticipation to legally usage the suggestions of min. Bodnara that he may have the anticipation of omitting the SN Extraordinary Control Chamber to approve the result of the election and indicate another body or judicial composition of a group of SN judges, possibly accepted by the TEU, who would have considered the approval of the result of the presidential election. president Malgorzata Manowska replied to Bodnar's suggestions in a position published on SN 5.06.2025, entitled "The State of the First president of the SN on disinformation of the public by the Minister of Justice and another politicians, as regards the power of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs to regulation on the validity of the election of the president of Poland".
The president of Manowska points out in this position the legal provisions giving the IKNiSP the constitutional power to examine electoral protests and to regulation on the validity of the elections of the president of Poland resulting from the provisions of the Constitution, the Electoral Code and the Act on SN.
If president Manowska had utilized Bodnar's advice, she would have mistrusted the line represented by the right that the provisions of the Polish Constitution were superior to the judgments of the TEU.
The clash with respect to the designation of the result of the election by IKNiSP SN will inevitably gotta take place, and I am convinced that the government organization has prepared respective options for specified an extension of the date of inauguration of the presidency of Karol Nawrocki, so that Holovnia can fulfill the dream of being president, even a replacement.
For example, the reigning 1 week's replacement president of Holownia is enough. Without respective laws signed by the Holovnia acquittals violating the law of Sienkiewicz, Bodnar or Domanski, these "gentlemen" would be in serious trouble.
The anticipation of extending the deadline for the inauguration of the presidency by the rulings lies in the denial of the validity of the approval of the election consequence by the home of Extraordinary Control of the SN, whose ability to deliver judgments is denied by the TEU. Min. Bodnar will most likely mention IKNiSP SN's approval of the election consequence to the TEU, which will drag the substance beyond 6.08, which will consequence in Holownia taking over the President's duties. The laws to be passed in the Sejm and approved by the Holovnia are waiting, including the incidental bill by Holownia will besides be signed by the President, so that after the EU Court rejects the approval of elections by the IKN SN the elder SN judges indicated in the Act of Incident.
And here is simply a fresh chance for conflict, as I call it fundamental, about whose verdict approving the result of the presidential election is final, or is the verdict of the IKNiSP SN, or is the "finaler" verdict of judges appointed by the Emergency Act invented and approved by the interim president of Holovnia?
What else do the rulers have in head to hold the date of the inauguration of the presidency of Karol Nawrocki beyond 6 August?
The designation by the ruling electoral verdict of the IKNiSP SN is not an option, as designation of the verdict without being referred to for verification by the TEU would be a real designation of the herbal "perestroika" of the judiciary. Although miracles happen all day, I'd be surprised.
The second option of extending the date of the presidential inauguration of Nawrocki is linked to the extension by Tusk of the state of panic threat of BRAVO by 31 August. The rulers, I am sure, take into account the anticipation of disrupting the process of inauguration of the presidency of Karol Nawrocki by announcing the state of emergency, as a consequence of mass street protests against the protracted procedure leading to the presidential inauguration attributed by the rulers of “Russian terrorism”, and in fact provoked, for example, by the start of the trial of Grzegorz Braun or the conviction of those arrested on 4.06, the leaders of the “Rodacy Kamrats” movement Wojciech Olszański and Marcin Osadowski, accused by the notorious probanderan prosecutor of peculiar tasks of Maciej Młynarczyk.
These protests, even without reaching out to ideas of mostly available artificial half-intelligence, could be given propaganda “status” of terrorist actions inspired by pro-Russian forces, which would justify the decision of the ruling state of emergency preventing Nawrocki's inauguration of the presidency, at least until the end of August. That's adequate for Holowhouse to decision from leg to leg to think of being a replacement president.
I think that the rulers have more ideas on how to extend the deadline for the inauguration of the presidency, which is suggested by the ruling AI on the services of the European EDS Democracy Shield under the EC. Nawrocki, yet he will be President, but Holovnia will besides fulfill his dream of being the deputy president. Dreams come true. It's worth a dream.
Jacek Frankowski
8.06.2025
