The windows of Life do not fit in the heads of left-wing critics. all now and then, there are texts or recordings in the media that have been inadvertently trying to discredit a solution that might be undesirable in an perfect world, but in this real 1 it is simply a rational alternate to much worse options.
"Life's window should vanish immediately from Poland!"; “The window of life, or place for unwanted children. Yes, the Church and the State are correcting their mistakes," the left-wing portal repeats. The 2 material he published around this issue exposes large misery at the level of arguments. This does not mean that a circumstantial harm is being done on the part of the receiving spiritual sisters. The authors of prosecution materials do not mention 1 specified example. The most serious pretext for attack is anonymity, the deficiency of identity of a kid who should know who he is.
Yes, it should, but in this distorted logic this kid does not necessarily have the right to come into the planet at all. And it is from this simple presumption that we should begin to discuss what belongs to man. The author of the text at NaTemat.pl attacks the current legal state, enabling – or at least not disallowing – the orders to lead the windows of life. As a “remedium” to this, in his opinion, bad situation, he states, among another things, the alleged right to abortion. In these talks, a kid appears as an entity only erstwhile it can be utilized against the thought of the Windows of Life. In another cases, a small, defenseless man is simply a furniture, a whim of the mother, to whom it is allegedly the exclusive right to decide whether to be or not to be of his own offspring.
Church – either “bad” or “our”
A parent who, for any reason, wants to keep her pregnancy a secret from her surroundings, while not wanting to kill her own offspring, receives thanks Good option window. It does not bear the vital, environmental, legal consequences of conception – not in all case of voluntary conception – and does not charge its conscience with killing a tiny man. Attackers of the “institution” of the Windows of Life seem the most to interfere with the fact that they are run by church organizations and are mostly well associated with average people, are perceived positively. Meanwhile, the only Church acceptable to the alleged mainstream media and politics is present either a disgraced institution, ridiculed by moral or financial scandals, or tamed, “complex”. This is not by accident, not by any another way, the case of the Justice Fund, where 1 of the main negative characters of the media and their overseers has made a priest dealing with charitable activities and turning immense amounts of money. Whether it will be found guilty or exonerated in a fewer years at the earliest, present it functions in the main circulation of the opinion as the on-call “blackness”.
From the point of view of the militant anticlericals – now besides established in the ruling spheres – it is very valuable to get for their propaganda purposes individual identified with the another side of the barricade. Preferably a “modern” priest or “converted” on the religion of a mainstream publicist or celebrity.
On the another hand, a well-known priest who, in addition, deals with loud, useful and uncontroversial activities, poses a immense threat to this arrangement – a stormy communicative with a dark, greedy, corrupt Church focused on collecting profits and political influences. The strength of things comes to head here the example of not so long ago taking over the "nobility package" – the acquisition made in the kind of peculiar services, with refined intrigue and in the midst of a scandal created by mass media. The “package” was a immense social success, and the authority of its creator – the horror of a Catholic priest – could in time endanger the position anointed by the leftist mainstream “the best in the world” specialists in aid for those in need.
The kid is to be ‘state’
One of the most expressive arguments presented by the authors “On the Subject” – although not always formulated straight – says: children left in the Windows of Life fall into the care of the Church. They should be subject to state supervision at once, as it is the civilian authorities who claim to decide the fate, education, education of tiny Poles. As we observe, the influence of parents on the form and content of the basics of school subjects is increasingly undermined. It is besides sought – and these are global trends – that minors who seem to have been born in their bodies by mistake may, without the cognition of their parents, submit to destructive and irreparable “trannies”, abortions and another nightmare procedures.
"The fault" of the Windows of Life is besides that, according to the facts, they put the coming kid into the planet as a person, alternatively than – as the advocates of ideology proclaiming the right to choice conceived children – the object to which subjectivity is possibly given, at the discretion of his mother. Therefore, among the "arguments" against the functioning of Okien, there are clearly alleged shortcomings of Polish law in providing women with alleged reproductive rights, read: full freedom in deciding the destiny of the offspring, which is frequently simply an unwanted fruit of moral promiscuity.
Someone will ask: Why would the alleged enemies be so hard on the Church? There is no request to respond to the communist times. At that time the clergy behind whom was a powerful institution, as well as – for many years – the global authority of the Polish Pope, were a strong support for the freedom aspirations of the tens of million people with a highly rich past and strong civilizational rooting.
All we request to do is remind many representatives of the church hierarchy during the covid “general” test of the global sanitary regime. Bishops, paralyzed shortly before, with full enemy propaganda woven on the basis of moral scandals involving a fraction of the clergy, gladly agreed to strict restrictions on church life, including closing temples. Of course, the clergy may have learned from that “right” “health path” which permanently vomited out of temples a visible condition of nominal believers. Perhaps, on another occasion of this kind, opposition from private or "functional" priests would be much clearer. This will most likely be shown in the coming years, due to the fact that the strategy of full control is slow but systematically closed, with the active participation of individual national governments.
What about the identity of the kid killed by the abortion?
The deficiency of name, surname, known parents is – as has already been mentioned here – a fundamental argument repeated by opponents of the Windows of Life following the United Nations, which has been pushing for their closure over a decade ago through its Committee on the Rights of the Child. Caritas then asked for an opinion on the case to justice Waldemar Żurek of the Krakow territory Court. In his reply, the Ombudsman noted: – In law, the concept of a state of higher necessity is known, where we sacrifice the good of lower value to save the good of higher value. In this case, the right of a kid to live is of course a good of greater value than the right to information, or the right of a kid to know his biological parents. But in addition to the law, there are inactive values that all man carries in his heart, they cannot be dedeceded, and they tell us clearly, let us save human life as we can.
We learn from justice Żurka about the practice applied by the judiciary in cases of children left in the Windows of Life. Respecting household law, courts are to effort to get them into adoption families as rapidly as possible. It takes time for the decisions to be finalised. Biological mothers can besides recover their children erstwhile the decision to abandon them was linked, for example, to postpartum shock and was carried out under the influence of emotion.
Adoption procedures in Krakow courts last 6 – 8 weeks. During this time the surviving kid receives individual data and legal guardian. – Of course, we know that it is best for a biological parent to rise her child, but reality is far from perfect. Better the kid to be in the Window of Life than in the Vistula or in the dumpster – stressed justice Żurek.
Caritas himself thus explains the thought behind the Windows: “This is simply a safe place where a parent can leave her newborn kid anonymously. The window opens from the outside, and there's heating and ventilation. After opening, the alarm is triggered, which calls the window-careers – most frequently nuns. Then medical and administrative procedures are immediately launched, i.e. emergency and household court are notified.”
As the Catholic organization points out, the intent of the Life Window is not to replace hospitals where the parent can leave the newborn by relinquishing parental rights. However, they are an alternate to abandoning a kid in a dumpster and depriving him of his care, which frequently involves actual conviction to death. This is especially the case by women hiding that they have become mothers. "Unfortunately, there are inactive cases of infants being left at random places where they are threatened with death from cooling, so we call for the dissemination of information about Windows. More than 160 children have been found in the Windows of Life conducted by Caritas Poland", the organization informs.
Roman Motoła
