Artur Szczepek: Why do I support Karol Nawrocki?

dzienniknarodowy.pl 1 month ago

Is it possible to support everyone? Can you communicate with everyone? Will everyone like you?

Technically, yes.

But it's just a explanation that touches the utopia. Where faith, convictions and values are involved, it is hard to agree there, especially erstwhile our faith, beliefs and values are tested.

Today we face a choice of who to vote for. We face a choice which of the candidates for the office of president of the Republic meets our expectations, or which of the candidates little forces us to bend our beliefs. This is not and will not be a comfortable choice!

I would very much like the fresh president to be the president of all of us – but he won't. I would very much like the fresh president to turn out to be president over (parties treated) interest groups – but he will not.

But he will be elected to this office. Whether we want it or not. Either 1 or the other.

Against fear and against the convictions of many of you.

I have already chosen and effort to realize those who do not share my choice. After all, I will meet many of you, talk, work and cooperate. Or it may happen that individual after my publication will not want to talk to me or work anymore.

Regardless of the motivation of all of us – and the voters and non-voters, voting against each another and voting according to our beliefs, let us not let ourselves be shared by politicians. We do not duplicate contempt and do not deepen divisions.

These elections and the fresh president are neither the end nor the beginning of anything groundbreaking. The key to change is our post-election attitude. Our activity in guarding and accounting politicians from their words and their promises.

My dears,

I address you present not as a typical of any party, but as a fellow citizen who, like you, wants an independent, safe, faithful Poland based on conventional values, individual freedom and an economy that does not kill the spirit of entrepreneurship.

We have a second circular of elections ahead of us. Many of us did not vote in the first due to the fact that they did not feel represented. Others voted for their candidates – expressive, uncompromising, speaking straight about the betrayal of elites, the request to reject globalistic agendas and defend sovereignty. Nevertheless, they did not enter the second round.

Today is not the time for grief. present there is no luxury of inactivity. due to the fact that if we ignore this moment, we will wake up in a country where all values that are close to us will be ridiculed, disproved or banned.

I appeal to you – nationalists, Confederate voters, Braun, conservatives, freedomists, entrepreneurs:

Don't waste this opportunity. Do not be drawn into cynical games in which our inactivity works in favour of the left and the globalists.

We don't vote for love.

We vote for responsibility.

We are voting against Trzaskowski.

We vote for Poland.

We vote for Charles Nawrocki.

#Byle NieTrzaskowski

At a time erstwhile Poland stands at a crossroads, and the most crucial decisions are taken behind closed doors in Brussels and chambers of ideological activists, the choice of whom to support politically ceases to be a purely organization matter. It's a question of civilization. In this context, Karol Nawrocki appears as 1 of the fewer characters who combine attachment to national identity with civilian and intellectual courage. That is why I support it, despite the differences in approach to any economical issues.

First of all, I object to the model of the "cloaking system" by the liberal-left camp. Governments of the civilian Coalition, supported by the president from the same formation, endanger to obscure the constitutional balance of the authorities. The tripartition of power is not ornamental – it is the foundation of democracy. If the Prime Minister, the President, the talker of the Sejm and most of the media talk with 1 voice, who will stay as a fuse? Who will say "stop" erstwhile the government starts bending the law on current business? Unfortunately, we already see attempts to circumvent the law and the Constitution by the KO – examples include unconstitutional appeals of prosecutors, submission to courts without statutory grounds or threats to independent institutions. Karol Nawrocki is 1 of the fewer characters who clearly say: no organization is allowed all. Even “democrats”.

The second reason for my support is opposition to the ideological tsunami, which present embodies Rafał Trzaskowski – an avant-garde of advancement which has small to do with the real good of man. Trzaskowski does not hide that his imagination of Poland is simply a country of a redefined family, cultural engineering and sex ideology as a basis for education. It promotes abortion as a human right, not a dramatic choice. It seeks to change national symbolism and tame society with a communicative that excludes Christian and conservative values. In this sense, his policy is not only another imagination – it is simply a cultural war. Nawrocki puts a dam on these trials. It defends the classical model of the family, says explicitly that sex is ideology, not science, and that children should be raised by parents, not by activists.

The 3rd point is sovereignty. The current power gives it back part by part in exchange for “European peace” and funds, which are frequently a tool for political blackmail. Karol Nawrocki clearly opposes the federalisation of the EU and the "green colonialism" forged by EU bureaucrats. He speaks loudly about the Green Deal trap, which hits Polish energy and agriculture. It condemns the thought of the ESG as a tool of ideological force on entrepreneurs. He advocates the protection of gold – a currency that remains a symbol and a guarantor of our economical independence.

I'm not hiding that Nawrocki is not the perfect typical of my economical vision. In any respects, he is inactive besides close to the position of the Law and Justices. But honestly, he had the courage to publically criticize the harmful elements of this policy. During his gathering with Sławomir Mentzen, he did not avoid hard subjects. He pointed to the problem of the expansion of bureaucracy, the dependence of many Poles on social transfers, as well as errors associated with excessive centralization. This honesty and willingness to dialog prove that Nawrocki is not a plastic policy. He thinks on his own, not according to the organization card.

Its determination to prosecute consistent historical policies is no little important. Nawrocki clearly says "no" both relativizing the genocide in Volyn and trying to rehabilitate communist symbols. Condemns flagism, focuses on cultivating historical fact alternatively than political correctness. He powerfully advocates the removal of russian monuments – not from hatred, but from respect for victims of totalitarianism. It's crucial to me. past is not an addition – it is our identity.

Is Nawrocki perfect? Nope. But he showed that he could listen. He showed civilian courage by criticizing his own environment erstwhile he thought it was working badly. And most importantly, it is the last wall that can halt the Citizens' Platform march, headed by Donald Tusk and his puppets, after full power.

I have no illusions – Karol Nawrocki is not a faultless politician. In many economical matters, he could decision further towards a free marketplace and deregulation. But after all – he, not an ideological activist in a suit, has the chance to halt Poland's drift towards a cultural, economical and systemic experiment.

I am very sorry that people with national and pro-entrepreneurship views, and especially entrepreneurs, do not have a typical in the second round, but these are the consequences of passiveness and ignorance of Polish business, which cannot unite and lobby as a compact organization for its solutions to improve the situation of SMEs and in defence of Polish economical interests. I'll do anything to make it change in the coming years.