Antoni Ciszewski: Lex super omnia – law above everything
The decree says that erstwhile for any reason 1 man is harmed on Earth, all humanity is harmed. In the event that the Polish citizen is harmed by the home justice system, the blame for this unworthy thing is not only the perpetrators themselves, but besides the full state administration – the prosecution, the courts – which disregards the service work resulting from legal legality, and for which errors (i.e. abuse of service powers or omission of service) are materially liable to the Treasury (Article 77(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland).
But indirectly – the moral blame – is besides borne by Members, Senators and Presidents of the Republic of Poland, who are liable for the adoption of circumstantial legal acts in the form of laws, then for allowing specified legal regulations to trade.
The judges of the Constitutional Court (e.g. erstwhile president Marek Safian) who incomprehensible Article 418 of the civilian Code by issuing a very harmful judgement of 4 December 2001 (Journal of Laws No 145, item 1638) are not exempt from specified authoritative fault. They could thus, knowingly and intentionally, act against the legal interests of all citizens, depriving them of appropriate legal protection in property matters.
The matters referred to below concern the legal interest of the injured and injured farmer Janusz Domański (his approval to print in this column his name) from the village of Pachole, Dębów Kłod.
The farmer became the victim of an authoritative collusion (few), in a situation where the motives for the faulty action which had been at the root of restructuring and modernisation of agriculture began to appear since 1992. It is this year that Janusz Domański as a farmer becomes 1 of the parties to the lease agreement for agricultural land of 156 ha, with the statutory right to first acquisition leased land.
However, in the tenth year of leases, i.e. in 2002, then, Agricultural Real property Agency The Terenowy Branch in Lublin decided to take the agricultural land from the farmer, contrary to the statutory law of preemption.
The accumulation of defective (in fact criminal) action by the employees of the Agency and the then BGŻ S.A. bank occurred upon the unlawful removal of the land and then the immediate termination of credit talks by that bank.
These are the individual signatures of the cases: the bailiffs, the prosecutors, and the courts in which possible criminal acts were committed, to the detriment of the victim himself and his full family:
– Case for the signature of Act I Co 757/09 of the territory Court in Radzyń Podlaski I civilian Division, before which enforcement proceedings were pending, were appealed against by the debtor (Janusz Domański) from the enforcement proceedings KM 177/03, KM 180/03, KM 56/05, in which the execution proceedings took place, due to the bailiff, in fact to embezzle agricultural property of 75.65 ha, which was the subject of judicial auction, and whose wine has not yet been tried. The failure to the detriment of the debtor amounted to about PLN 1.3 million;
– Case for the signature of Act Ds. 702/11/S of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Radzyń Podlaski, in which there was premature waiving the investigation; the criminal appeal procedure (II Kp 199/11, II Kp 393/11) resulted in the maintenance of the prosecution's defective position, in connection with the aforementioned enforcement case;
– Case for the signature of Act Ds. 903/12/S of the territory Attorney's Office in Radzyń Podlaski, where it happened again prematurely waiving the investigation; the criminal appeal procedure (Ko 194/12) has resulted in the maintenance of the prosecution's defective position in connection with the aforementioned enforcement case;
– Case of the subsidiary indictment (signed by Advocate Mark Harasiuk) for the first of Act K 1303/11 of the territory Court of Radzyń Podlaski, then for the first of Act II K 618/12 of the territory Court of Radzyń Podlaski, then transferred to the territory Court of Łuk for the first of Act II K 600/12, where it was yet valid remission of proceedingsin connection with the above-mentioned enforcement case;
– Case for the mention of Act Ds. 895/11 of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Parczev, where it happened refusing to initiate an investigation, in connection with the agricultural harm suffered on agricultural gain, due to the auctioneer's fault, and which were wholly owned by the injured Janusz Domański, in connection with the above-mentioned enforcement case;
– The case for the files Ds. 1056/11 and Ds. 1336/11, both cases of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Parczev, where the investigation was refused; the criminal appeal procedure (II Kp 27/12) maintained the prosecution's defective position, in connection with the harm suffered on agricultural gain, due to the auctioneer's fault, which was entirely owned by the injured Janusz Domański, in connection with the execution case;
– Case from the subsidiary indictment (signed by Advocate Mark Harasiuk) for the signature of Act II K 49/13 of the territory Court of Luków, where it was final remission of proceedings, in connection with the harm suffered on agricultural gain, due to the auctioneer's fault, and which in their entirety belonged to the victim Janusz Domański, in connection with the above-mentioned enforcement case;
– Case for the signature of Act Ds. 548/12 of the territory Attorney's Office in Parczew, where the defective refusal to initiate an investigation; the criminal appeal procedure (II Kp 212/12) ended in the maintenance of the defective position of the prosecution, due to the harm caused to the agricultural benefit, due to the auctioneer, belonging to the injured Janusz Domański, in connection with the aforementioned enforcement case;
– Case for the mention of Act Ds. 594/12 of the territory Attorney's Office in Parczev, where the defective case occurred remission of the investigation; the criminal appeal procedure (II Kp 283/12) resulted in the maintenance of the defective position of the prosecution, in connection with the sale by the auctioner of the underlying agricultural land to the fresh buyer, with whom in June 2012 they destroyed maize in an area of about 50 ha, to the detriment of the injured Janusz Domański, in connection with the execution case;
– The case with the subsidiary indictment (signed by Advocate Mark Harasiuk) for the signature of Act II K 192/13 of the territory Court of Radzyń Podlaski, where the proceedings were officially terminated, in connection with the resale by the auctioner of the underhandedly torn agricultural land to a fresh buyer, together with whom in June 2012 they destroyed maize in an area of about 50 hectares, to the detriment of the victim Janusz Domański, in connection with the execution case;
– Case for the signature of Act Ds. 636/12/D of the territory Attorney's Office in Parczew, where the same as above occurred;
– The case for the signature of Act Ds. 598/12 of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Parczev, where there was a false accusation of Janusz Domański and Krzysztof Joszczuk, who defended against the bandit demolition of maize crops, acting in specified a way as to defend private property, in the form of future agricultural benefits, wholly owned by Janusz Domański, in connection with the execution case;
– The case for the signature of Act II K 1859/12 of the territory Court in Radzyń Podlaski, where falsely accused: Janusz Domanski and Krzysztof Joszczuk were found guilty and who only tried to defend private property, in the form of future agricultural benefits, wholly owned by Janusz Domański, in connection with the above-mentioned enforcement case;
– Case Ds. 2215/12/S of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Radzyń Podlaski, from the announcement of the victim Janusz Domański, where premature waiving the investigationwith apparent harm to the case;
– Case for the signature of Act Ds. 497/13/S of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Radzyń Podlaski, from the announcement of the injured Janusz Domański, where premature waiving the investigationwith apparent harm to the case;
– Case indemnification for the mention of Act I C 500/11 of the Lublin territory Court, Case indemnification of Act I C 1008/11 of the Lublin territory Court, where the action was dismissed entirely, due to this Court.
This cross-section of prosecutorial and judicial cases, initiated by the victim and the victim Janusz Domański, shows in a clear manner how severe cases of authoritative anesthesias Poles gotta deal with, regardless of who performs public functions in the state administration during a given period.
It is simply a state of unquestionable clerical shame – besides the social harm of a forbidden act, in a situation where there is no judgement of circumstantial perpetrators, and authoritative support simply spreads a protective umbrella over a defective prosecutor-court environment.
Currently, the auction date was set for 16 October 2024 with a property of 0,54 ha (the property of the debtor Janusz Domański in the village of Pachole, Dębowa Kłoda gm) on the execution case: KM 189/13, KM 333/13, KM 334/13, KM 335/13, KM 336/13 and KM 1115/14 of the bailiff at the territory Court in Radzyń Podlaskie Elżbieta Wierzbicka with its seat in Miedzyrzec Podlaskie.
The proceedings took place at the request of the creditors: the National Centre for Agriculture Support, Terrestrial Branch in Lublin (formerly: the Agency for Agricultural Property, agrarian Division in Lublin) and BNP Paribas Bank Polska SA (formerly BGŻ SA Bank), who previously were creditors who were perpetrators of an illegal act, leading to the bankruptcy of the farm of the injured and injured Janusz Domański.
The full case was made public in 2002, described in the local press and tv Polsat, erstwhile CBI officers were handcuffed by erstwhile BGŻ bank manager in Parczew, Witold O., which has played a key role, including undoubtedly a bandit course, implicating, among others, this farmer in a corrupt strategy of preferential loans granted with ARIMR subsidies.
In the criminal case referred to for the mention of Act II K 412/10 of the territory Court of Radzyń Podlaski, the above-mentioned case (as erstwhile manager of the erstwhile BGŻ SA bank in Parczew) was twice found guilty of the act of corruption committed, with a progressive punishment of imprisonment, but the territory Court of Lublin XI Criminal Division Appeals for the mention of Act XI Ka 362/11 strangely acquitted this perpetrator in June 2011.
It is possible that the reason for this extraordinary kindness of the appeal court was the fact that, 3 months earlier, from the application of the injured Janusz Domański, an action for damages in the case for the ref. of Act I C 500/11 of the Lublin territory Court. The value of the action was PLN 12.5 million. The suspect was the Agricultural Property Agency, on whose behalf the Treasury was present, represented by the lawyer General.
Indirectly, the abovementioned criminal case for the signature of Act II K 412/10 was a preliminary action against BGŻ SA for causing the bankruptcy of that farmer.
Unfortunately, in this case, justice has not been done to this day. Unexpectedly, however, the intent of the execution was to deprive the victim of his only dwelling and residence.
OUR COMMENTS: For the Polish People's Republic, farmers and clergy were the only social groups independent of the government that contributed to the collapse of the russian “paradise”. Postcommunists did not forget either 1 or the other. Therefore, they are inactive at gunpoint of ruthless corruption-propagand apparatus and “laws” adopted in Warsaw.
We besides recommend: A drunk Ukrainian has been detained. Turns out he's already been chased by a BOLO.
