For over 21 years, I have undertaken a proverbial digging with a horse. I fight the authorities of III RP/PRL BIS for honesty and integrity knowing I was in a losing position. During this time, I collected respective metres of current papers elegantly compiled. specified rich material requires separate development. I said it. I'm an older guy of 76+, and my time here on this Earth's death is inevitably coming to an end. For this reason, I present my point of view of my digging with the authorities of III RP/PRL BIS. It'll take a fewer model papers.
We – people of technology – have no problem knowing respective basic laws of the ruling: a clear and strict formulation of thoughts, correct reasoning and justification of claims. That's what logic does. The primary function isConjunction of sentences besides called the logical product of sentences. This function says that conviction or series of sentences are actual erstwhile and only erstwhile all elements of conviction or thrust of sentences are true.So 1 false, false component of a conviction or conviction is adequate and the full argument can Throw it in the trash.. It's different with alleged Humanists and all kinds of levitations. The usage of logic in their operation does not apply as shown below. The relation or the product of logical sentences is very simple and clearly explained on the basis of the things we face all day.
Example 1.
Example 3
Remember, kid, don't share it with nobody.
Anyone who understood arithmetic [describes basic actions on numbers: addition, subtraction, multiplication and division] He must have put that expression in his head for life.. Why? Unable to do 0:0 division. However, all stubborn individual can do it, only that the consequence of this sharing can come out different each time, due to the fact that specified action is not unambiguously definedSince people invented numbers and relationships between them.
Proof 1. 3×0=0; likewise -5×0 = 0. False motion 3=-5.
Proof 2. 24:8, or 24, you gotta subtract 8 times 0. Conclusion 27:0 why?
Proof 3. 6:3=2, due to the fact that 2×3=6. False conclusion 6:0=X so Xx0=0.
CONFUSION MISTORY OF THE CONGO (551 – 479 B.C.E.) Chinese philosopher, creator of Confucianism in force in China to this day. For the consciousness of time. PITAGORAS (572 – 497 B.C.E.) Greek philosopher and mathematician. ARCHIMEDES (287–212 BC) Greek mathematician, physicist and engineer. The Times CONFUCTURE The Emperor of China asked him. If you had power, where would you start?CONFUSION He answered without hesitation. My governments would start by defining concepts.
CDN
