AGENT HOLLAND WITH JOSEPH STALIN IN THE BACK
Polish Nobel Prize laureate Wisława Szymborska convinced Poles that Lenin is Adam of fresh humanity:
“.that he led the wounded in the fight
new humanity Adam’,
about Stalin's death:
“What day is the order that gives us
On the banners of the revolution, profile four?
Under the banner of revolution, strengthen the guards!”
Joanna Senyszyn, a reinforced concrete steelist who says that it is simply a pity that Kaczyński's parent did not steal, possibly the future president of Warsaw, is eager to give interviews about the Cross of the Lord, most frequently the “Rabbit Jump”:
“Do you wear a cross around your neck”? He's asking rebe.
“You know rebe, how can you even ask?! I loathe myself! I'm anti-cruciate at all.
What will be fashionable this fall according to Joanna Senyszyn? –
There will surely be a cross fashion in Poland – the Euro MP evaluates. Senyszyn besides claims that the cross before the Presidential Palace has an impact on technological discoveries. – It will aid in the search for the G point, due to the fact that the cross in Krakowskie Przedmieście is simply a written G point and that's why Piso – crusaders who are not able to get an orgasm and are frustrated – says Virtual Poland Joanna Senyszyn, b. Euro MP of SLD.
On his blog, Senyszyn concludes:
".Palikot has a lot to learn from,"
“.not everyone has a brother on Wawel!”
“Jarosław Kaczyński jumps on his brother's coffin like Piłsudski on a chestnut!”
Agnieszka Holland confided in expressis verbis in “Wprost” by Tomasz Lis and Piotr Najtub:
"When Stalin's wife died, he started large cleaning," comments Jarosław Kaczyński after his brother Agnieszka Holland died.
And then:
"Life begins erstwhile a drunk teddy bear vomits to cross-shaped cans after “Lech” beer in a crowd of haters of Poles.
Writing is simply a sect that acts sectarianally. They, or Jarosław Kaczyński, now have the only goal:
– get as much space for your brother's corpse. They already have Wawel, they already have the Warsaw Uprising, now they want the Presidential Palace. In a moment, we'll find that's not enough, due to the fact that this beast is so gluttonous. due to the fact that the deceased requires more and more.” And he's already made us look like a dummies, and he's out of his bag.
About Jarosław Kaczyński:
"He is not a symbol, Antigone; a sore mask, it is simply a mask of hatred and rage, which you can see as shortly as he removes the mask of a good uncle"- And this should be ridiculed and mocked utilizing all possible tools – specified as impudent and demented sectarians under the cross in front of the Presidential Palace. comments Agnieszka Holland, an outstanding Polish philosopher, a failed Oscar winner for “In Darkness”. She was already sewing a bag.
“ Cross paranoia goes back to its zenith. Writing – Crusaders have madness in their eyes and hatred in their hearts. They blackmail the Szczypińska MP with their mouths; they will agree to the transfer of the cross if they are guaranteed in writing that where the cross stands, there will be something to commemorate the victims of the Smolensk catastrophe. Blackmail is simply a crime. Setting up the cross without notification also” – they consider Holland of Senyszyn. Under the presidential palace there should be a monument to the Red Army liberator, not to any thug Lech Kaczyński and drunken Blasik – Holland claims on the CODE march.
And then:
“ If individual wants to commemorate the dead, let him put up any monuments he wants, but in a place allowed after obtaining the approval of the cemetery managers, alternatively than creating by the sect Pisto – cross-breeding all period in a public place and blackmailing the recently elected president of Poland Bronisław Komorowski.
Agnieszka Holland – movie manager belongs to the most fanatical expressions of anti-religious and anti-patriotic phobias.
Behind “The Jump of a Rabbi” he claims that patriotism is racism (Jewish “GW” Tomasz Żuradzki – “Patriotism is like racism”).
Holland combines these phobias with the constant tracking of anti-Semitism, fierce hatred and hostility towards everything Polish, combining Stalinist ideology with coarse attacks on Jarosław Kaczyński and his party.
Member of the Honorary Committee of the candidate for president of the Republic of Poland Bronisław Komorowski, the initiator of a well-known protest against the construction in Warsaw of a monument to the victims of the Volyn massacre made on Polish civilian population by Ukrainian nationalists from the CNS – UPA.
In the texts of interviews given by Holland, there is constantly a negative image of Poles as a nation, immature, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, shallow-saturated unreasonable religiousness.
Holland continues the methods of fanatical communist agitation of its parents Henry Holland and Irena Rybczyńska – a pair of Stalinists with the aggressivity of participating in Bolshevik nags on nonconformist scientists – among others, in a shameful study on an outstanding Polish scientist – prof. Władysław Tatarkiewicz.
At Holland there is Adam Michnik – the biggest fascist in Poland, according to the Warsaw paper – (Warsaw Newspaper) on 23-30 December 2015 in an interview with Aldona Zaorska and Ewa Stankiewicz – having an honorary Ph.D. of the Pedagogical University obtained in opposition to the majority and social protest, supporter and promoter of Poland's merger with Ukraine in the above-mentioned "Pol-Ukr, or Ukr-Pol" with fresh borders and fresh Polish-Ukrainian anthem. “Poland has not died yet” – to the basket.
Adam Michnik confesses:
“I was a Communist in sixty years. I thought communist Poland was my Poland. The environment from which I come is simply a liberal judaic komuna. It is simply a judaic female in a strict sense, due to the fact that my parents came from judaic backgrounds and were communists before the war. Being a Communist then meant more than belonging to a party, it meant belonging to a language, to a culture, a phobia, a passion.” (Restraint and Work) No. 6 1986 .
Adam Michnik's parents came from the communist Communist organization of Poland with the program:
– joining Poland to the USSR,
– separations from east Poland,
– and the resignation of the “brothers of socialist Germany” of advanced Silesia and Pomerania.
Adam Michnik's father was a associate of the Central Committee of the Communist organization of Western Ukraine, a tried agent of Moscow in Poland /H. Piecuch “Special Actions” – Warsaw 1996 p. 76 and entered with Brystygierowa – “Krowowa Luna” in the rank of Colonel NKWD, Berman, Chajn, Grosz, Kasman, as part of a separate cell, straight subordinate to Moscow.
The Communist organization of Western Ukraine has consistently sought to break up Poland, to cut off a large part of its lands and to join the already devastated russian panic of east Ukraine.
Adam Michnik's mother, Helena, a committed communist before the war, after the war, became “famous” mainly with dogmatic textbooks recommending, among others, the most effective fight against Catholic religion.
The educational influence of Adam Michnik's parents did not bypass his brother Stefan. He belongs to a group of Stalinist executioners, as a associate of 1 of the groups of judges liable for the murderous sentences. Among another things, he judged in the above-named “Tatarovski cases”.
He gave death sentences to individuals in Communist-fabricated processes of independency activists.
The death sentences in loud cases of advanced officers from General Tatar's group were not the only death sentences that Stefan Michnik ruled. Only that these another sentences – in the case of officers of the independency underground are much little known.
Like the death conviction signed by Stefan Michnik on Major Charles Sęk. Major Karol Sęk artilleryman from Radom, a pre-war officer, then an officer of the National Armed Forces, was executed from the conviction of justice Stefan Michnik in 1952. As in the case of Stefan Michnik led by the execution of the death conviction on the magnificent Polish patriot Andrzej Tchaikovsky – Cichonymnym, Warsaw insurgent, deputy commander of the combined bars “Oaza-Ryś” in Mokotów and Czerniakow, decorated for heroism in the fight against Germany by the Virtuti Militari cross. He was murdered in Mokotów on October 10, 1953 under the supervision of Lieutenant Stefan Michnik (Piotr Jakucki “Our Poland” 20 October 1994).
Around michnikovszczyzna a swarm, the stars of Polish journalism themselves, and this is Monika Olejnik, to whom politicians run on their knees, in order not to lose credibility, and this is Catherine Kolenda – Zaleska, the bravest of the bravest in clashes with the laptop of how Ziobry there is. And this is Grzegorz Miecugow, the fresh incarnation of Stefan Martyka - a “radio barker” with early PRL with the infamous daddy Brunon Miecugow in the background. Daddy “beknownst” among others to sign “resolution 53” in the Kraków Curia process in 1953 erstwhile death sentences were handed down. He was a signatory of this resolution together with the Bolshevik writers Wisława Szymborska and Sławomir Mrożek.
TVN tv with Justyna Pochanke, Grzegor Kajdanowicz, Kamil Durczok, Bogdan Rymanowski, mentioned Grzegorz Miecugow, and with another servo-lithist electronic speakers surpass the humiliation of the president of the Republic Prof. Lech Kaczyński and all 8 million “bovines” associated with him, as the “professor” of the thug Władysław Bydgoszcz.
Not only Kuc / Kutz / and Senyszyn are advisers to Janusz Palikot, which is widely known.
However, the another advisors of Janusz Palikot, whose father Marian was a Lublin money-maker who issued Jews in the Gestapo's paws, are not known. www.zwzw.wordpress.com 6.08.2010/ – writing on his order "literary" vile scenarios:
Jacek Kajtoch TW nickname – codenamed “Jacek diversion” academic teacher at the Jagiellonian University, longtime secretary of POP PZPR at the Polish Academy of Sciences in Krakow, ideological communist, long-standing and current V-ce president of the Management Board of the Main Union of Polish Literature, and Krakow Branch of the Association of Polish Literature.
A individual friend of well-known SB agents: /prof. Tadeusz Hanausk, Prof. Olgird Terlecki, Prof. Kazimierz Buchała all from the Jagiellonian University /. It derives from the Silesian Germanized household – the household name of Jacenty KANTOCH.
Sam tells with pride about his household that they served not in the Polish army, but in Wehrmacht. Unfair individual / educator of academic youth/ plagiar in the Jagiellonian University.
He was removed from the Jagiellonian University for repeated plagiarisms, at the time he was active with the “Literary Life” ed. SB-ek Władysław Machejek, from where he was thrown out again for plagiarisms concerning the work of Józef Ignacy Kraszewski. V-ce president of the communist self-proclaimed Krakow Regional Association of Polish Literature (KOZLP) from the anointing of the president of the ZG of the Union of Polish Literature (ZLP) TW Marek Wawrzkiewicz / kryponym “MW” / appointing politically incorrect colleagues before the KozLP and ZG ZLP.
His boy Wojciech Kajtoch completed postgraduate studies in Moscow before the dissolution of the russian Union.
A individual friend of all the esbeeks in the ZG of the Association of Polish Literaries with his wife Anna Kajtocha the thought communist helped break up the non-communist KOZLP, for which he received a prize from the ZG of the ZLP in the form of financing trips to People's China. The ZG ZLP, under the authority of Donald Tusk, financed travel to China to the People's Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal Andrzej Rzepliński and others service "Lwowskie Meetings" and "Our Poland".
Together with the manager of the Faculty of Culture of the City Hall of Krakow Stanisław Dziedzic, manager of the Śródmiej Centre of Culture in Krakow Janusz Paluch, not illustrated from the list of Wildstein, suspects of cooperation with SB, with his wife Anna Kajtochowa and others, he organizes published literary events in Krakow, inviting all SB agents at the ZG ZLP.
Censor of poetic almanacs in ZLP together with the last Censors of the Polish Academy of Medicine, Maria Orwid, judaic Mason, founder of the judaic Freemular Lodge B’nai B’rith feminist prof. at AM.
A associate of the opposition together with Stanisław Dziedzic and Janusz Paluch celebrations in Krakow “Days of Katyń”. Claims that there is evidence that the Katyn crimes were committed by the Nazis and Hitler was a statesman.
According to Jack Kajtoch, the findings in Yalta belonged to Stalin for his heroism during planet War II.
The Management Board of the Association of Polish Literaries is exclusively composed of secret co-workers of SB, besides advisers of Tusk – Komorowski – Palikot:
– president of ZG ZLP Marek Wawrzkiewicz – pseudonym, codename of MW, associate of the Polish People's Tribunal in Moscow,
– v-ce CEO J acek Kajtoch – nickname, codename
‘Jack – diversion’,
– v-ce president Aleksander Nawrocki TW Ministry of Interior,
– v-ce CEO Krzysztof Gąsiorowski pseudonym, codename KG,
– v-ce president Andrzej Zaniewski nicknamed TW “Witold Orłowski”,
– v-ce president Wacław Sadkowski nicknamed ‘Olcha’,
– v-ce president Leszek Żuliński nicknamed “Literat”, “Jan”, writer “Tribuny”,
– v-ce president Grzegorz Wiśniewski TW Military Services,
– Aleksander Krawczuk – TW communist refused to repeat
joining the ZLP due to the fact that not all are communists.
It is the communist minister of culture who organized the ceremony of Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz at the Pęksowy Birzko Cemetery in Zakopane to bury a 23-year-old Cossack.
Currently, the “paedestal” statesman is “Wolski” – Wojciech Jaruzelski.
In a fresh interview with “The Jump of the Rabbi” Jaruzelski stated:
"Ks. Jerzy Popieluszko is simply a martyr, not for faith, but for politics, sowing hatred and not submitting to government and party".
On TVN's tv programme “ Period over and” hosted by Monika Olejnik J.E. archbishop Lublin metropolitan “Philozof” TW Józef Życiński stated that “Poles are anti-semites”.
How much do you should be mean and angry to not respect the remainder of the dead? How much rudeness and unparalleled bastardity does it take to talk of blood on the hands of the Wawel Cathedral of Lech Kaczyński?
When Palikot, a friend of Bronisław Komorowski, said that the late president Lech Kaczyński had blood on his hands, or erstwhile he talked about the shooting and gutting of Jarosław Kaczyński, it would seem that there could be no greater bastardity.
Turns out he can. Bigger is the bastardry of Kazimierz Kuca / now Kutz /, who in TVN backed up like a bash, admitted cynically and proudly that he is the advisor and manager of performances of a friend of Komorowski Palikot.
Kuc justified his presidential friend's message that it was PiS that spoke of blood on Tusk's hands. There was no explanation for the fact that no PiS politician always said anything like that. I repeat – no PiS politician always said anything like that.
And Tusk is alive, he can defend himself, and Lech Kaczyński rests in the Wawel crypt and can not defend himself against charges.
The sad thing is the broken shoe of Kuca, even more sad than the rude wickedness of Tuska Palikot's tube. due to the fact that Palikot is Palikot, a politician and friend of the president, a worthless clown tube of Tusk and PO,
Puc is simply a movie director, educator of generations.
Recently, Mrs. Kucowa reported to the police that the home in which they live with their husband was covered with paint and the writing threatened to kill them.
The culmination of the actions of this horde of thugs is the current conflict of the rulers against Christianity and the symbol of the religion of the Cross of the Lord, which the president of “all Poles” called the Komorussian, most likely jointly and in agreement with the agent FSB /KGB / and his own “destroyed” WSI services.
In the first fire, Polish villains cut off the Papal Cross on the Kraków Błonia night of May 2010, then the Judaism of “unknown perpetrators” did the same in Przemyśl and in Tatra Rys – the summit of our Homeland.
The threats were besides sent to the cross in Stalowa Wola, then beheaded.
The Cross of Christ will not be defended against the Presidential Palace in Warsaw.
Here, pepper spray, water cannons, physical force including beating were utilized against a fistful of defenders.
The beastly kick of the ruling thug and their companion Dominic Taras, a praying older man was broken ribs, police and municipal guards did not intervene.
A man who suffered injuries died. And blood was shed under the Cross of the Lord – Tusk declared that order had to be made at the Presidential Palace.
A drunk 17-year-old girl came up to the people praying and said, "Do you have a dick?" Let me see, let me see!
The “happening” night was arranged with names, drunkenness and orgies, with the approval of the president of Warsaw Hanna Gronkiewicz – Waltz, under the aegis of a 23-year-old bandit-cook from the ASP, and above all the “word of God” of the church hierarchy and this “word of God” from Jasna Góra:
This cross is simply a part of furniture.
A fresh form of Polish business was created. abroad national external forces search to lose its origin and no longer be delicate to its own identity shaped by the age-old Christian and cultural heritage. The same forces possessed the Church.
Black Agentural Night of Polish business launched on 4 July 2010 lasts.
Film manager Agnieszka Holland is 1 of the most fanatical speakers of anti-religious and anti-patriotic phobias. It links them with the constant tracking of anti-Semitism, fierce hostility to the right and coarse attacks on Jarosław Kaczyński and the murdered presidents of Poland Lech Kaczyński and Ryszard Kaczorowski.
He frequently performs in public as a defender of the Beast described by Tadeusz Płużański.
In particular, Natalia Brystygierska "Blood Luna" has a peculiar interest in NKVD, not only highlighting its origin, but not to mention the "effects" of Brystygierski, who put the testicles in the drawer in the Lviv prisons of the NKVD, slamming it rapidly.
The false image of Poles “In Darkness” extorting money from Jews hiding from Germany in ghetto canals belongs to the anti-Polish series launched with the book “The Painted Bird”, Jerzy Kosiński and the “literature” of the “fact” of J. T. Gross.
In interviews given by Holland, we inactive encounter negative generalizations about Poles as a nation that is allegedly immature, anti-Semitic and xenophobic, oversaturated with shallow unreasonable religiousness, etc. With specified a spirit of discipline, Agnieszka Holland, Poles, actually continues the methods of fanatical communist agitation of her parents Henryk Holland and Irena Rybczyńska. This pair of Stalinists took part in the hunts for nonconformist scientists, among others in a shameful study on the excellent Polish scientist – prof. Władysław Tatarkiewicz.
Agnieszka Holland's father and her sister Magdalena Łazarkiewicz came from a judaic family. During the war he served in the Red Army, then in the People's Army of Poland. Author of many oppressive press articles to the National Army and the independency Underground. He led an ideological conflict with representatives of Polish science, inter alia, against the Lviv-Warsaw Philosophical School, fueling the atmosphere of ideological accusations resulting in arrests and another repressions.
Holland combines these phobias with the constant tracking of anti-Semitism, fierce hatred and hostility towards everything Polish, combining Stalinist ideology with coarse attacks on Jarosław Kaczyński and his party.
Member of the Honorary Committee of the candidate for president of the Republic of Poland Bronisław Komorowski, the initiator of a well-known protest against the construction in Warsaw of a monument to the victims of the Volyn massacre made on Polish civilian population by Ukrainian nationalists from the CNS – UPA.
In the texts of interviews given by Holland, there is constantly a negative image of Poles as a nation, immature, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, shallow-saturated unreasonable religiousness.
Holland continues the methods of fanatical communist agitation of its parents Henry Holland and Irena Rybczyńska – a pair of Stalinists with the aggressivity of participating in Bolshevik nags on nonconformist scientists – among others, in a shameful study on an outstanding Polish scientist – prof. Władysław Tatarkiewicz.
On 23 December 2006, Agnieszka Holland gave a comprehensive interview to the writer “Gazeta Wyborcza” Roman Pawłowski for the “High Obcasy” supplement. An interview titled “All About My Father” was a crucial part of the lies about Father A. Holland. A truly honest title of the interview might be: “Many lies about my father.” It is simply a clear lie, for example, to say that the writer “Election” R. Pawłowski suggested that Henry Holland was only “For a minute he was a believing Stalinist...”. Well, this supposedly short “soon” lasted in Holland's résumé for nineteen years – from its connection in 1934 to the Polish communist movement dominated by the Stalinists until his brutal attack in 1953 on the technological achievements of the then-dead celebrated philosopher Kazimierz Twardowski.
An highly insolent lie is Holland's message about her father's engagement in the coverage of the Polish Radio of the fabricated political process of László Rajka in 1949. A. Holland stated, defending her father's behavior: “I know from my parent that the experience of this process was groundbreaking for him.” She suggested that H. Holland, influenced by the experience of the process, changed in a “breakthrough” way, which is to say, became profoundly critical of Stalinism. The fact was very different. It was after the trial of L. Rajek in 1949 that the biggest Stalinist pigs in H. Holland's life occurred, among others, to participate in 1950 in a vile informer letter opened to Prof. W. Tatarkiewicz, “remarking” in that 1950 1 of the students as a “dangerous enemy” or later by 3 years, a brutal, pavvilant attack by H. Holland on the work of Prof. K. Twardowski (1953).
STELINIST HENRIK HOLLAND
Let's go back to Henry Holland for a while. He was born on 8 April 1920 in Warsaw in a mediocre assimilated judaic household as the eldest kid of Viktor Holland and Franciszka from the home of Likier. According to the book by Krzysztof Persak, “The Case of Henry Holland” (Warsaw, 2006, p. 133): “From the twelfth to the fourteenth year of his life, Holland belonged to the left-wing Zionist scouting organization Haszomer Hacair, and in 1934 he became active with the communist movement, joining the Revolutionary School Youth Union, which was the construction of the Communist Youth Union of Poland. A year later, he was admitted to the KZMP. (...) Since the fall of 1936, Holland has served as a liaison between the head of the National Central Editorial Board of KPP Abram Kagan and the editorial board of the single-lithofront organization ‘Popular Journal’ (...).
After the outbreak of the war, H. Holland managed to enter the areas occupied by the russian Union – to Lviv. There, among others, he collaborated with the notorious russian reptile “Red Flag” and with the editorial board “Youth Stalinowska”. In June 1943 he took part in the first convention of the Union of Polish Patriots, established by the Soviets to prepare actions for the subsequent Stalinisation of Poland. On 14 June 1943, he was admitted as lieutenant to the Tadeusz Kościuszko Division. As of February 1944, he was an teacher in the Political and Educational Division of the 2nd Division. He was promoted to captain in November 1944. He joined the PPR in December 1944. As early as April 1945, he received his first very crucial promotion. He became the editor-in-chief of the weekly supporting Communists under the name “Young Fight” issued by the Young Fight Union. He directed it until September 1947. In 1948 he was elected to the General Council and the Management Board of the Polish Youth Union. At the end of 1948, he became a associate of the editorial committee of 1 of the most grim organization newspapers spreading the country – “The Tribunes of Freedom”.
As a highly trusted companion, he was seconded in September 1949 to the most celebrated Stalinist demonstration process – the László Rajek trial in Hungary. Rajk, 1 of the most fanatical Hungarian communists, was for respective years an interior minister, eating out pro-Western opponents of communism. In the communist party, he was peculiarly popular as a native of Hungary and was so all the more hated by the dictatorly ruling Hungarian judaic leadership group headed by Mátyás Rákosi. Rajka was accused of “anti-Soviet nationalism” and “titoism”, torture forced him to confess to alleged wines and hanged in front of the window of his wife's cell.
Holland, fanatically inclined to trial with “nationalists”, with all the greater pleasance reported for the Polish Radio the process of the Hungarian “nationalist deviation”. It was 1 of the meanest “effects” in his life. It is worth adding that Holland took a very active part in the propaganda run against “right-nationalist deviation” in Poland. He was furiously attacking Gomulka (cf. K. Persak, op. cit., p. 148).
In the academic year 1946/1947 Holland began philosophical studies at the University of Warsaw, combining them with a organization career full of devotion to Stalinist ideology. He was truly ruthless towards the expected “enemies of the people.” Krzysztof Persak described (op. cit., p. 139), as he erstwhile described, “when the University Committee examined the substance of the removal of an activist who in a personnel survey withheld that his father was a pre-war police officer, Holland said that this student “is an example of a dangerous enemy who crept into the ranks of our party”, and proposed that the organization organization notify the safety authorities of its resolution. Holland's informative proposal from the College Committee was accepted unanimously. It is not known what destiny happened to a student in this way of “recommended” UB.
Leszek Moczulski recalled in his book “Lustracja” (Warsaw, 2001, p. 140) that Holland played a function in his removal from the organization in 1949.
A peculiarly disgraceful episode in Holland's life was his participation in a group of 8 students, members of the PZPR who performed in March 1950 with a brutal, public attack and a tip on the celebrated philosopher – prof. Władysław Tatarkiewicz. According to K. Persak (op. cit., p. 139), “these students wrote an open letter to Prof. Tatarkiewicz, protesting against the alleged admission to the “purely political speeches of a clearly hostile character to the socialism of Poland” and tolerating them. This initiative, undoubtedly inspired by the organization authorities, was most likely an component of the intrigue leading to the prof. being deprived of the right to lecture and conduct classes a fewer months later.
Among 8 authors of the shameful open letter, which caused the final removal of Prof. W. Tatarkiewicz from the university, were Henryk Holland and his wife Irena Rybczyńska, Bronisław Baczko and Leszek Kołakowski. Years later, even 1 of the signatories to this open letter (donos) Bronisław Baczko considered the contents contained in it to be “dangerous and terrible nonsense”.
In October 1950, Holland began his doctoral studies at the Department of doctrine History, the famed “Marxist smith” – Institute of technological Personnel Education at the KC PZPR. In 1953, he publishes his most disgusting work, in fact a pavquilant attack on the impotent, due to the fact that since 1938 the celebrated philosopher – prof. Kazimierz Twardowski “Legend on Kazimierz Twardowski”. He attacked prof. Twardowski's doctrine for alleged “theoretic poverty”, branded it as highly obscurant, fideistic, cleric philosophy.” prof. Twardowski called “the fideist flying the sacristy”. With rage he attacked all those who praised prof. Twardowski's technological achievements before the war, “demonstrate” them as expected “fascists”.
According to K. Persak, “Holland's pamphlet, even taking into account Stalin's standards at the time, due to an exceptional violent attack on the founder of the Lviv-Warsaw School, raised any controversy in IKKN. The author utilized an highly aggressive language (...)". It came to the conclusion that in defence of Holland's totally destroyed achievements the deceased philosopher appeared in a letter to the editorial board of “Phosophical Thought” (the first printed pashquil of Holland) prof. Tadeusz Kotarbiński. Criticizing Holland's work, Kotarbiński stated: “This is an unceremonious elaborate. It is full of grips, utilized in indiscriminate quarrels to give feelings of disregard, contempt and ridicule. Twardowski has been allowed to utter highly abusive expressions, which I do not want to quote again" (K. Persak, op. cit. p. 141).
Because of the widespread outrage of the venomous form of Holland's work, which was expressed in technological circles, even in the dogmatic Marxist circles, it was considered to be a deliberate distance from the pamflet. This was done by the editorial committee “Phosophical Thoughts” headed by the celebrated discipline inquisitor Prof. Adam Schaff. In consequence to the letter of Prof. T. Kotarbiński, the support for “a fighting speech of criticism” was emphasized, but it was admitted that the editorial committee “did indeed neglect in the course of editorial work the removal from the article of any unfortunate, written by the author in a polemic flame of phrases and phrases” (K. Persak, op. cit., p. 141). Moreover, IKKN's directorate decided to reprimand Holland for “an inappropriate organization attitude”. According to K. Persak, the prosecution of this organization punishment was “caused by the unique outrage that this publication has caused in the technological community.”
This was truly shocking – Holland's pashquil proved to be besides brutal in kind even for the atmosphere of Stalinist times!
Not “all were dirty”
Agnieszka Holland these flashy examples of Stalin's pigging her father did not interfere with the highly lying bleaching of his past in an interview published in the “High Aliens” of December 2006. Apparently, she hoped for mediocre memory or even full ignorance of readers. She counted right, due to the fact that as far as I know, for a fewer months, until my present text, no 1 protested against her rude lies.
To better whitewash her father's past, Agnieszka Holland utilized the old grip of various Stalinist children. He strives to emphasize – as supposedly in those times almost “all were dirty.” Says in an interview with “High Aliens”:
“I don’t want it to sound like an excuse, but it is hard to justice my parents’ choices without taking into account the historical context. Communism was an thought that shook the planet and took under its wing a crowd of the most perfect youth. For many of them there was no another alternate to Fascism. Whosoever is without sin, cast a stone. In Polish past there were only a fewer people so determined, so brightly endowed with the planet that present they can be national heroes without blemish.
Most have a dark and bright side in themselves by having to make choices in situations that are unclear, dramatic. Including the large characters today, specified as Dmowski or Piłsudski. This besides applies to saints, as Father Maximilian Kolbe, who, on the 1 hand, sacrificed himself for a man in a concentration camp, on the another hand, led an anti-Semitic writing before the war. erstwhile you look at Zbigniew Herbert, who has been a symbol of bronze opposition for years, and then you read what he was talking about erstwhile talking to the ubeks, you will find that icons do not exist.”
It's hard not to be outraged erstwhile you read how Agnieszka Holland compares her father – a Stalinist fanatic, destroying people, with characters embodying boundless love for their fellow humans like St Maximilian Kolbe. How outrageous is the effort to whiten Holland's Stalinist through the vile slander of Zbigniew Herbert, a poet who preferred to starve in a time of Stalinism alternatively than go to the slightest bow to the regime.
Holland tried to justify Stalin's commitment to her parents besides by carefully throwing mud at the Second Republic, portraying it in a monstrously dark way. This is what Holland's grim imagination of the Second Republic looks like:
“The problem of involving any of my parents in communism is so complex that we should have the full conversation about it. This was influenced and seduced by the thought of social justice, and by the disappointment of the Polish interwar period, which did not become the homeland of glass houses. Democracy was lame, authoritarianism grew, and the inability of the ruling, and on the another hand, there was an exclusion of the otherwise thinking, persecution of minorities. Young people of judaic origin were persecuted and rejected regular (burning, bench ghettos, number clausus, excesses of the All-Polish Youth). No wonder they were looking for a place in the ranks of the organization that preached equality of all races and gave the excluded sense of community."
II The Republic with all its errors and limitations was besides a real oasis of democracy against the background of russian land of gulags and large cleanups. Only tremendous blindness and confusion could decide to choose Stalin's Russia at the expense of Poland. Let us add that this optimizing for the russian Union all time meant simultaneous betrayal of Poland, entering the Red Targowice road.
Contrary to lies, Agnes Holland has no justification for her father's long-standing relation with Stalinism and for harming all those he considered enemies of the system. However, it must be remembered that Henry Holland himself yet paid a very advanced price for his pro-communist choice.
H. HOLLAND'S DEATH CULISES
In 1954 Holland underwent a fast evolution of views from utmost dogmatism to revisionism. In the following years, during the fierce conflict between the inner-party factions of the “Jews” (puławian) and “chams” (natolins) joined, of course, the faction of the Pulalans. He was friends with leading leaders of Puławians, including L. Kasman, A. Starewicz, A. Alster, J. Finkelsztein, R. Zambrowski. On 12 November 1961, H. Holland met with French correspondent “Le Monde” Jean Wetz and his wife.
It began a series of events that led to H. Holland's tragic death. During the gathering held at the Wetz apartment, Holland revealed the revelations of Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev about the circumstances of Stalin's death and the overthrow of Beeri. Holland committed large carelessness, as the Wetz flat where the conversation was held was well “protected by radio” with the aid of a wiretap arranged by the Ministry of Interior. After the announcement by Wetz in “Le Monde” of revelations heard from Holland, Władysław Gomulka fell into a terrible irritation, fueled by suggestions from ureters who did not hatred puddles. Gomułka enraged the threat of accusations from Moscow that communist secrets were leaking from Poland to the West, specified as Khrushchev's mentioned confessions at the 21st legislature of the Communist organization of the russian Union about the circumstances of the overthrow of Beeria.
As a consequence of an investigation by the Ministry of Interior, Holland was arrested on 19 December 1961. Holland did not hide the facts and made an extended statement. He didn't anticipate prosecutorial sanctions, he thought only organization punishment for indiscretion could happen. He was all the more shocked by the news that he could face at least 5 years in prison under the draconian decree of martial law. In specified conditions, a suicide jump occurred on 21 December 1961 from Holland's flat window during a revision conducted by SB.
For many years there have been disputes around Holland's death scenes. any authors, specified as Jerzy Eisler, made suggestions about killing Holland. The IPN investigator Krzysztof Persak explicitly crossed out the presumptions, based on the MMA materials he reached. He pointed to the complex causes of Holland's suicide. In Persak's opinion (op. cit., p. 257): "It is possible that Holland felt somewhat betrayed by the leadership of the party, which a loyal associate inactive believed to be. His behaviour in the investigation was a manifestation of organization discipline, and yet he was released into the hands of a safety apparatus. possibly specified a treatment made his ambition worse. He was an egocentric, he seems to have a tendency to narcissism. The fact that he, an old Communist and a well-known organization publicist, acted as a common citizen must have reconciled his advanced self-esteem.
The arrest and charge with Article 7 of the tiny Penal Code meant a blow to Holland's life plans, which was to leave in 1962 for an attractive 6-month scholarship from the Ford Foundation. All of this was now to be crossed off. It was besides a hard individual situation after the divorce with I. Rybczyńska, a sense of loneliness and increased kidney disease."
Early career A. Holland
Father's suicidal death must have made a large mark on Agnes Holland's consciousness. You can and must appreciate the strength to last it. However, this must not mean approval for her uncritical bleaching of her father, who for many years was a heartless, fierce Stalinist. It is besides hard to accept her attacks on the Church, Polishness and patriotism, which had previously been attacked by her father, starting with his participation in the KPP environment – a organization of national betrayal.
The beginnings of A. Holland's movie career came in the 1970s – the time of improvement of the alleged moral cinema of anxiety. At the time, she made films specified as “Provincial Actors”, “Heat” and “Self Women”. She was greatly promoted by Andrzej Wajada all the time. Already in the 1970s, Holland's movie production marked a highly accented feminism, especially in the tv movie “Something for Something” (1977). The film's heroine, docent, quits having kids due to the fact that she wants to make a career.
At the time of the martial law, Holland was in the West on 13 December 1981. She decided to stay there permanently, which opened a fresh chapter in her movie career. It has been very powerfully dominated by commercialism, the pursuit of place success at all costs, even with apparent harm to the truth. Above all times Holland expressed relativism, blurring clear, precise boundaries between good and evil.
Avengers to the Catholic Church
In the statements, actions and works of Agnieszka Holland, there was inactive a clear dislike of religion, and especially of the Catholic Church. As Margaret Sadowska wrote about it in the text “Agnieszka Holland does not go to church” (“, November 30, 2006): “She grew up in an atheistic home (parents were communists), under the large influence of her mother, who believed in the afterlife as evidence of the weakness of a man who is incapable to bear the tragedy of his condition. And from a father from a assimilated judaic family, as she says, “the judaic heritage did not receive at all.”
She never resented her parents for not bringing her into the metaphysical side of the world.
“My parent equipped me with a strategy of values so consistent, attractive and noble that I always felt that I had a strong moral skeletal or vital skeletal. It was a base that allowed me to make free choices later. However, in Catholicism, in its frequently thoughtless ceremoniality, there is simply a kind of convenience. You feel relieved to ask yourself the meaning of your own actions. Especially in the Polish Church, the concept of free will is constantly questioned by practice (...)".
Agnieszka Holland is very critical of the Polish edition of Catholicism. She is convinced that by the weakness of our “amateur” inactive democracy, Poles are more susceptible to “the blackmail of spiritual values”. Politicians who usage Catholicism as a machuja call – paraphrased by Prime Minister Kaczyński – lie-Christians.” ... And the fact that in Poland very many priests, bishops or institutions related to the Church, specified as Radio Maryja, usage anti-Semitism as a religious-political weapon, is precisely evidence of “the lie-Christianity”.
In excusing his utmost prejudice towards the Catholic Church, A. Holland says that she was “rejected” by the Church, saying:
“The prince with whom I was dealing did not want to welcome me into the Church. I don't know whether they might be in problem due to the fact that I'm not an adult or due to the fact that – and in 1 case surely due to the fact that – they were anti-Semites. They felt that since my father was Jewish, it excluded me from the Catholic community.”
In her statements, she repeatedly attacked Catholicism, peculiarly criticizing “Polish Catholicism”. In an interview with “Cultural Week” of 23 July 1989, she claimed that “Polish literature (...) has always sinned (...) Catholic-patriotic rigidity”. In an interview with the “Super Express” of 23-24 September 1995, she confessed, “I have no peculiar sympathy for Catholicism, nor for the Church, nor for the clergy.”
In another interview – for “High Aliens” of 23 December 2006 she accused that “Polish Catholicism was always philosophically insanely shallow, patriotic-political, not theological or mystical.” In that year 2006 she demonstrated a peculiar expression of her hostility to the Church by photographing herself in a T-shirt with the inscription “I do not go to church”. “And it must be said that this slogan was perfectly on it,” commented the writer “Cross” (November 30, 2006). It belonged to the most active people attacking Mel Gibson's celebrated movie “Passion” for alleged anti-Semitism.
Agnieszka Holland's anti-Catholic phobias were reflected very clearly in her movie work. Starting with the movie “Kill the priest” (1988), where she consciously deformed the character of priest Jerzy Popiełuszko and clearly embellished the character of his esbek murderer. In the movie “The 3rd Miracle” (1992) she showed the character of a doubting priest. Both in this movie and in others (including “Julia is coming home”) Holland sought to spread the ideology of fresh Age, serving to replace religion by filling spiritual and spiritual space in societies with descriptions of paranormal phenomena, alleged secular wonders, etc. In the Breton home of A. Holland you can find ceremonial Mexican figures and wud dolls – “about their dangerous power Holland was expected to personally convince itself”, wrote the writer “Cross” (No. 30 November 2006).
Holland's attitude to the clergy illustrates well the message that she snuck out in an interview with “Rzeczpospolita” of 25-26 November 2006: “I am curious in people making utmost life choices. Terrorists, priests.” Comparing terrorists and priests together as “extremists” is another alternatively peculiar product of Agnieszka Holland's mentality.
Compassion for SB Killer
Atheist A. Holland, full of hatred for Catholicism, unscrupulously addressed the subject of the heroic death of priest Jerzy Popieluszko, mainly for commercial purposes. Objectives very clearly imprinting their imprint on A. Holland's movie production, in peculiar on her films filmed after remaining in the West in December 1981. At the same time, A. Holland's attitude to commerce, not to mention her fierce dislike of the Church, was irrelevant to the real facts about the martyrdom of the celebrated Catholic priest. In a review devoted to the Holland movie “Kill the priest” Maciej Pawlicki wrote: “The central character of the movie is not the victim, but the executioner, not priest Popieluszko, but his killer, Captain Piotrowski. The communicative is told from his point of view, by his decisions and his actions" (cf. M. Pawlicki's review “Kill means to lose”, “Cultural Weekbook” dated February 26, 1992).
Stefan Mucha in a review in the weekly “Ład” (12 November 1989), reprinted from the second-cycle magazine of young Catholics “Nowa” (No. 5–6 of 1989), besides expressed his very critical relation to the movie “Kill the priest”, writing, among others, “Unfortunately, I did not like the movie from beginning to end. He hurt, irritated and upset, just disappointed. (...) Agnieszka Holland claims that after the movie she was very tired of being liable to everyone: the Vatican, Poles, priests, producers and distributors. So if she felt liable to me as a Pole, I have the right to believe that it would be better if she hadn't done the film.”
Maciej Pawlicki concluded in a review of the movie “Kill the priest” quoted earlier, commenting on the effects of Holland's collaboration with commercial Western producers: “(...) It is clear that Holland has had to compromise many times, which sometimes dangerously approach the border of good taste."
This tendency to proceed major trade-offs with commerce is inactive characterized by Holland films, even though its most exclaimed movie “Europe, Europe”, created clearly according to various simplified stereotypes. In addition to the interesting character of the main character Simon Perel, a young hebrew saving himself by pretending to be German and acting in Hitlerjugend, we observe the image of a young Pole – “antisemite”, who yet pays death for his anti-Semitic virulence and image of a good German. The “Week Week Review” of 29 March 1992 commented on the movie “Europe, Europe” as further evidence that Agnieszka Holland “(...) is going to make very serious compromises with the cyclically responsive alleged mass viewer (...)”.
Commercial considerations had a maximum impact on later films by A. Holland. The most typical in this respect was her loud image “The Master's Copy” (about Beethoven). It's a maximum commercial leap for an American viewer.
Agnieszka Holland insists on continuing attacks on the current ruling elite of power for her very critical attitude towards the PRL. In an interview with “Politics” of 2 December 2006, she stated that “it would be essential to make a movie of a generation that spent her full life in a strategy that was then completely negated. So their achievements, their strategy of values, everyday life, joy, sorrows, greatness and falls were besides denied. Everything has been crossed off."
In this interview, A. Holland powerfully attacked the Kaczyński brothers for their critical attitude towards the pathology of the 3rd Republic, saying: “Let's go further, 1989, a fresh Poland was created. Kaczyński came and this period was besides denied. The next generation learns that what it was doing made no sense. No wonder people are depressed. The economy is growing, there are more shops and more mobile phones, but their sense of meaning has been so profoundly hurt that I don't know how to build a healthy social life on it. If I were to make a movie about it, I would show that all human life has meaning and value. It means to return to Christian principles, which our leading politicians have completely forgotten. They forgot what their Gospel taught them and what their beloved pope taught them, to whom they set monuments. That's why I call them Christian liars."
“The Powers” in today's power elite?!
Agnieszka Holland went the farthest in her attacks on Kaczyński brothers and another current ruling politicians in an interview given to Roman Pawłowski for the “Gazeta Wyborcza” supplement – “High Aliens” dated December 23, 2006. No less, she accused the current ruling squad of “endekoidal-uretary-gomulkowska threads”, i.e. anti-Semitism. She alleged that the attack on KPP was the same as the attack on Zionists for Gomulka. To attack the ruling politicians, A. Holland was powerfully encouraged by writer “Electoral” R. Pawłowski, complaining in a question directed to the manager about the tracking of the heirs of the Communist organization of Poland (KPP) by J. Kaczyński (let's remind that in the present “Electoral” it is swarming with children of known KPPs!).
Answering Pawłowski's question, A. Holland said, among others: “I am very sorry that the most disgusting Polish flaws return and have specified a resonance in society. (...) Endekoid-Oener threads, urina-Gomulk which appear in today's elite of power, are abroad to me, disgusting. The Jews are an awkward subject for politicians, but they do not usage it directly, although if you say ‘KPP’, that is the association with the Jews. KPP in the context of the Prime Minister's statements means the same as Zionists for Gomulka. Not to mention that promoting Father Rydzyk gives a placeet for anti-Semitism."
Still an interview for “High Aliens” Holland accused current governments of allegedly restoring authoritarianism in Poland. However, she comforted readers that “The return of authoritarianism in Poland does not endanger the global balance”.
Accusing the right-wing squad in Poland present stated that: “Politics give themselves a dangerous mouth, which destroys public assurance in them all, discourages people from acting and feeling liable for the country. Everything else is the derivative. And the fact that the elites do not respond to clearly utmost and criminal views, and that people close themselves in the ellipse of private affairs, and that the common trust rate is the lowest in Europe in Poland."
One of the most scandalous parts of the interview with the tracker of “Polish anti-Semitism” was a passage devoted to a figure who had been deceased for decades. Pawłowski asked: “Can the communicative of the parish priest from Jedwabny Józef Kębliński, a witness to the demolition of the Silk Jews who were murdered by his parishioners, be the subject of the film? Would you make a video of him with empathy?’ Let us remind that empathy is the ability to realize and feel another people's intellectual states, to feel in their experiences. Shockingly, A. Holland answered: “Why not? If you can make an empathy movie about Adolf Hitler.” How devoid of even a shadow of good taste, it was even rude to compare Fr J. Kęblinski with A. Hitler. It was a despicable misgiving of the courageous priest who deserved to save Jews in Jedwabne (I mention to the interesting memoir of Senator Prof. Ryszard Bender about Fr. J. Kęblinski in the 2001 Voice).
Poisonous assaults on the ruling right
Agnieszka Holland is besides a typical believer in “the morality of Kale”. The whitewash of communism, with the vigor justifying the Stalinist collaboration of his father, is more likely to take out in fanatical attacks on the ruling right. He abuses his position as internationally known movie manager for mentoring hatred abuse against the current elite of power.
Symptomatic in this respect was a fanatical, full of anti-right and anti-national phobia interview with Holland published in “Rzeczpospolita” from 25-26 November 2006. The interview is in Orwellovian entitled “Pleasure of Hate”, although these words should primarily concern the director’s chaotic hatred (an interview that is especially ashamed of “Rzeczpospolita” for making specified a condition of fanaticism and hernia sound).
Here are any of the typical passages from Agnieszka Holland's rabid vocabulary:
“(...) However, personally I accomplish a higher degree of irritation erstwhile I follow the stupidity of Polish politics and behaviour of people who spoil my country. (...) In Poland, I see Mr Kaczyński, who, after the election, begins with the words: ‘Despite the different attacks on us, despite the chase...’. So says the man who has full power over the media, at least the public, dominant ones. He cannot say, ‘Maybe we made a mistake, possibly people didn’t realize us...’. Instead, there's a hoodlum. I'm terrified of this kind of arrogance and disrespect for another man. After all, the political opponent is not the enemy... The authority we've never been rich in, we kill. But if people who have done so much for Poland on social, patriotic and artistic grounds are prepared, what can be expected? Why do the full elite of the country destruct democratically elected authorities? What do you call intelligence a liar-elite? ...’.
The most utmost nonsense spoken by Holland in this interview is her message that in Poland
“The intellectual scenery is terrible. I cannot accept the fact that in my country there is simply a language of hatred, slander and lies in public life that has never been here before. And he's nowhere in the civilized world. erstwhile I come to Warsaw, I turn on the tv and perceive to debates of Polish politicians, it is, with the good exception of 3 candidates for president of Warsaw, that my hair gets on my head. Violent attacks, complete deficiency of work for the word, terrible form. In France, political debates take place at a different level. In the United States too."
He highly accurately pointed out these idiotic speeches by Holland Stanisław Michalkiewicz in a column in “Our Poland” dated 5 December 2006, writing:
“Let us return to the command to cleanse ourselves of hatred. Agnieszka Holland claims that in Poland there is simply a language of hatred, slanders and lies that has never existed before. Well, never before. So the language of hatred, slanders, and lies was neither for Stalin, nor for Gomulki, nor for Gierk, nor for Urban at war? Apparently, due to the fact that can those eyes lie? Agnieszka Holland is simply a large girl, which even Stalin inactive remembers well, so she knows what she's saying. And he says, actually, he teaches that a political opponent is not the enemy. Her father, Henry Holland, most likely felt the same way, who wrote articles after the newspapers against pollinating dwarfs. This was a chivalry rivalry, a kind of benevolent banter, and actual hatred came only now, with the Kaczyńskis, what they raised their hand in their impudence even at once.”
One can admire the “continuance” of manipulation with which A. Holland opposes the “uncivilized” Kaczyński and another right-wing politicians Jolanta Kwasniewska as a suitable standard for the Nation. According to Holland, “Mrs. Kwasniewska has shown any class, elegance and moderation”. You gotta agree with the red comment again. S. Michalkiewicz:
“(...) It's besides bad Agnieszka Holland didn't say erstwhile she showed it all. Is it moderately during the period of the propriety of the nomenclature, or class during the feast with Mr. Żagł, Kuna and lobbyist Dochnal? It would be good to know these things precisely so as not to be average by mistake, let us, at the Saigle, and again class, in the ownership transformations."
Among the lies contained in A. Holland's interview we find an accusation against ruling politicians: “How can you spit on Miłosz, Kuronia, Herbert? How many people do we have? This is cutting the branch on which you sit.” The prosecution was clearly targeted at the incorrect address. no of the politicians in power present attacked Miłosz or Kuronia, though many of their actions and statements deserve any very harsh criticism. It is simply a disgusting talk to attribute Herbert’s right spit. The large poet consistently spitted on by “red” and “pink”. Let us remind here the celebrated hooligan of the author Tomasz Jastrun, who accused the late and incapable poet of alleged severe intellectual illness. This “pink” and “red” leftists with stubbornness blocked the show on tv of the celebrated movie Jerzy Zalewski about Zbigniew Herbert, mainly due to his very sharp and well-deserved words about Miłosz and Michnik. This is investigative writer “Election” Anna Bikont and Joanna Szczęsna “showed off” on 29 April 2000 with a disgusting talk at Z. Herbert – in a conversation with Gustav Herling-Georgian.
Bleaching PRL and Communism, A. Holland attacks the ruling right-wing elite for utmost criticism of the fallen system, complaining:
“The life of respective generations whose youth and maturity fell upon the time of the Polish People's Republic has been denied. Suddenly, everything people achieved there was stripped of any value. It's a terrible injury. And this state is stalling due to the fact that now politicians are negating the values of the next fewer years. Each another squad negates everything that happened before. On this basis, nothing strong can be built.”
Soon after, A. Holland proceeds to attack Radio Maryja and his listeners, stating, “I am annoyed by Rydzyk’s father’s politics, I am amazed by the fanaticism of ‘moher berets’, but I cannot look at these people as any kind of insect.”
How cynical it sounds after the insults of A. Holland to the alleged fanaticism of “moher berets” her calming message that, however, “she cannot look at these people as any kind of insect”! In this context, it is hard to disagree with the pronunciation of the ironic commentary ed. S. Michalkiewicz in “Our Poland”:
“Can the full class see how noble and sublime Agnieszka Holland is? This sacrifice should be appreciated, especially erstwhile we realize that it requires the restraint of instinct. In specified a situation it is clear that it is no longer appropriate to ask why Father Rydzyk's policy is so annoying, what is the fanaticism of moher berets and what is so bad about it, due to the fact that everyone seems to realize that with Agnieszka Holland we should be filled with only a feeling of deep gratitude. How hard Stalin and Berman put it to teach us tolerance, how many bones Rosański and Fejgin broke, how many fire articles Holland wrote, and the dark mass of old can't realize that tolerance is not to let Gierty into school under any circumstances that only melodies...’.
“Poland is not Europe”
The utmost tracker of the alleged “Polish anti-Semitism” Agnieszka Holland is known for the constant publicity of highly negative generalizations about Poland and Poles. I reviewed a large condition of A. Holland's interviews for various Polish magazines and newspapers, and I did not find a good opinion about Poles and Polish matters anywhere. All the more was there various extremes and false generalizations which stigmatized various Polish behaviours and attributes of Poles. Here are any typical examples from the surface of specified a publicized movie director.
In an interview with “Cultural Week” dated 23 July 1989. Holland stated:
“I must admit that I find it annoying in the Polish culture the ease with which its extrateriorization of evil comes, its tendency to bear work for evil always from outside. This has consequences in all areas of life, including art... Not taking work for existing evil besides takes revenge in everyday life. Poles have already become so close to the thought that they are guilty of doing something wrong, that they should do it better (...). I think that if you consider this circumstantial Polish escape from work and the complete ruin of the work ethos, then you can say that Poland is not Europe."
How likewise A. Holland attacked the alleged negative qualities of Poles in a 17-year interview later, given in December 2006 to the additional “Gazeta Wyborcza” – “High Alien”. She stated, among others:
“Poles have a tendency to become immature... They're easy to manipulate ideologically. We have already paid a fewer times a price for this and we are paying to this day (...). Poles did not have the strength to face evil within themselves. It's always been exteriorated, it's always been different, whether it was Russians, Germany, communists, or Jews. Now it comes back to this, the PiS squad correctly sensed that Poles are terribly tired and request to simplify the planet and appreciate themselves. The only way is to exterirate evil. Recently, these complexes have even legalized, for example by introducing an absurd and shameful article into the fresh Lustration Act, providing for prison sentences for “public speaking to the Polish people about crimes” (...).
The above-quoted lying statements by Holland are simply absurd. It is shocking to accuse Poles of being “easyly manipulated ideologically”. The nonsense of specified accusations is best demonstrated by the fact that Poles have given much more examples of opposition against communist slavery than any another nation in Europe and in the world. Let us callback only facts specified as the armed opposition of the independency underground against communism in 1944-1947, the Poznań uprising in June 1956, October 1956, the speech in Nowa Huta and a number of another Polish cities in defence of churches in the early 1960s, a very wide scale of speeches in defence of the Catholic Church on the occasion of the Millennium in 1966, student demonstrations 1968, the revolt of Coast workers in 1970, labour protests 1976 in Radom and Ursus, a 16-month era of “Solidarity” from 1980 to 1981, labour strikes 1988 to 1989.
With respect to another charges, let us ask A. Holland whether it is truly essential to remind you that Poles had a legitimate right to blame the invaders for their harm during 123 years of captivity, and did not have the right to charge the Germans and Soviets for crimes committed against us? Attacked by Holland as a disgraceful article of the Lustration Act is essential in a situation where various types of anti-Polish slanders in the kind of M. Safjan, A. All or M. Silent are increasing.
Let's add that A. Holland is bored with her negative generalizations about Poles. In an interview with “Rzeczpospolita” of November 2006, she again complained that: “Poles have always had a tendency to blame others and not take work for their own decisions.”
In fresh years, Agnieszka Holland has clearly increased her interference with matters so clearly disliked by her country. For example, she was celebrated for being a small boastful contributor to the protest of respective people opposing the construction of a monument to the victims of genocide made by the Ukrainian Insurgency Army in the east Borders. For Holland and co-participants of this infamous protest (e.g. B. Geremek and known for the anti-patriotic fanaticism of Thomas Jastrun, the thought of erecting the monument hides the intention of “spreading hatred”. someway no 1 accuses specified intentions of many monuments in various countries of the planet in honor of judaic holocaust victims, due to the fact that it would immediately be considered something insane. Only Poles are strangely attacked for wanting to commemorate the victims of genocide committed on them.
Dissemination in his interviews of an highly dark image of Poland and Poles, Holland strangely forgets that it was first launched in Poland and that it owes its first appreciation to Poles who were attacked by it, before being noticed in the world. She pointedly reminded Holland and another “disgusted Polish barbarians” of this to the creators of writer Teresa Kuczyńska, writing in the text “The creators on Freud’s goat” (“The Weekly Solidarity” of December 8, 2006): “All Polish creators who made and do careers abroad first gained designation and fame in the country. The designation of those people they despise so much. So, ladies and gentlemen of the creators who so disgust this country, the people of the country. If you spit in them like that, you spit on yourselves. due to the fact that they made you who you are. Recognized writers, painters, directors.”
It is worth mentioning here a alternatively peculiar justification of A. Holland, why he does not intend to return to Poland from France, where he has lived since 1981. Holland explained her reluctance to return with the fact that any things hindered her in Poland “in a captivating way”. More specifically, “I am disturbed by anti-Semitism and stupidity, cynicism and corruption of politicians.” So let us remind you that in France there was no shortage of political corruption and no shortage of corruption (vide the celebrated communicative of Prime Minister Beregovoy's suicide, caught on a corruption scandal, or posthumously revealed unclean acts of even more celebrated president Mitterand). As far as anti-Semitism is concerned, in France, it is without comparison larger than in Poland (it was late marked by the Israeli ambassador to Poland, Szewach Weiss), which is most likely even the strongest in the full Europe of today.
Selected ‘family’
Sister Agnieszka Holland – movie manager Magdalena Łazarkiewicz – clearly shared the tendency to search for mostly dark features in Poles. Years ago, she wrote a screenplay of the movie “Pogrom” based on events of the Kielce crime of 4 July 1946 on a customized by German (!) maker Arthur Brauner. Of course, this script was as far as possible from recalling the function of the actual NKVD and Ubek perpetrators of this communist crime. Magdalena Łazarkiewicz is besides known for seeking commercial publicity at all costs. Her thought to advance 1 of her films was celebrated erstwhile by means of a short part of advertising, characterized by rude, obscene eroticism. respective tv stations, otherwise far from the right, rejected the commercial invented by M. Lazarkiewicz, recognizing it as pornographic and out of all taste.
The phobia of Holland's daughters was clearly adapted by her husband Magdalena Łazarkiewicz – manager Piotr Łazarkiewicz. In 1995, P. Łazarkiewicz joined the run for the W. Cejrowski programme “WC Kquadrans”, in a peculiarly aggressive way accusing him of promoting fascist ideology. As a associate of the Supervisory Board of Polish tv SA Łazarkiewicz sent a letter on 10 March 1995 to the National Broadcasting and tv Council, whose main thoughts I quote below for the article ed. Stanislaw Michalkiewcza: “Ciemnogrod – Jasnagrod” (“The Most advanced Time”, No. 8 of 1996): “Wojciech Cejrowski laughs and mocks people of views another than he... Cejrowski's favourite mark of mocking attacks is the press reports, mainly abroad – describing all kinds of events beyond the mentality of the quilt (...). What is behind the ‘WC Quarter’? The mentality of a widely understood quilt... of the same 1 who is always an enemy of progress... of the 1 who makes there inactive a large patch of the dark garden.... ‘WC Quadrangle’ awakens my deepest outrage and disgusts me. I cannot realize how it is possible for a broadcast to appear on the Polish Television, which the lead in a transparent way promotes the ideology of f...” (distinction of S. Michalkiewicz).
Piotr Łazarkiewicz's attack on Wojciech Cejrowski was supported by his boy Antoni Łazarkiewicz's letter to KRRiT, together with 60 signatures of the advanced school students and teachers he attended.
Let us remind here that Cejrowski reacted to the assault of Mr Łazarkiewicz by referring the case to court. In the first instance, Łazarkiewicz was convicted by a conviction ordering him to apologize to Cejrowski for “insultive words and false allegations.” However, the case continued at various instances and yet ended with the release of Łazarkiewicz from charges due to the “appropriate” legal-political decision of the ultimate Court.
Like the wife and sister-in-law P. Łazarkiewicz besides tries to exposure the alleged “Polish anti-Semitism”. He made a movie “In the mediate of Europe” about the pogrom of Jews in a town in the east of Poland. In another movie “Hunting on witches” Łazarkiewicz branded supposedly “crazy” (as he claimed in the addition to “Election”) in the early 1990s in Poland “discrimination and homophobia”. Łazarkiewicz besides “distinguished” with a violent speech during the alleged Equality March.
A fewer sentences at the end
Henry Holland was hurt and became a victim of the same totalitarian strategy that he co-created for many years, in the name of which he himself harmed many people. Holland's death was a large understandable drama of his loved ones, which, however, cannot go hand in hand with bleaching his “do” from the past. It's hard to reconcile with fanatical phobias, clearly inherited from H. Holland by his daughter. Agnieszka Holland has never gained a distant look at the Stalinist views of her father, the “enemies of the people”, with the peculiar enmity of the effort to destruct the achievements of the philosopher Prof. K. Twardowski for his Catholic pronunciation. Agnieszka Holland is far from recognizing the sad fact that her father, starting with his relation with the National Treason organization – through post-war immersion in Stalinism, in fact represented an attitude that was in favour of the most costly of Poles. The anti-Polish and anti-Catholic phobias of Agnieszka Holland are a small glorious continuation of any of her father's phobias.
Documents, quotations, opinions:
– Prof. Jerzy Robert Nowak "Red dynasties" Agnieszka Holland
http://www.bibula.com/?p=52696
http://nie Correctni.pl/blog/2171/agnieszka-holland-z-jozef-stalin-w-tle
http://rodaknet.com/rp_szumanski_61.htm
http://ortimespapismo.salon24.pl/pionek/post/223049,agnieszka-holland-z-jozef-stalin-w-tle
http://aleksanderszumanski.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=172&Itemid=2
http://aleszum.salon24.pl/223049,agnieszka-holland-z-jozef-stalin-w-tle
