That's what he called mine. Sikorski people who think that decisions concerning us should fall in the country, the constitution is an overriding law, agriculture must be protected and it is impossible to agree to the Silesian secession. People with independency views are inactive majority in Poland, but will they be able to choose the government?
The officers of communist services are very capable of taking over or breaking up opposition environments. Disintegration classes (seminars, exercises) must be conducted early in education, as this cognition is an crucial part of the officer's skills. The model action was to break up in 1947 a millionth PSL organization that actually won the election. A well-known method was utilized for "patriotic faction". specified a "more ideal" faction was formed around Widy-Wirski's activist and brought together about 5% of members, which made the functioning of the PSL much more difficult. After the organization was yet broken, the 2 factions merged and formed the United People's organization (ZSL) – an eternal communist coalition.
Similar scenarios can besides be observed today. It is even easier to set up a chairman, or get a majority on the board. "Uncomfortable" organizations - specified as sibiraks, cartoons, veterans of Poznań June, AK (the leader of the planet Association of Soldiers of the AK was a SB!), were controlled according to the recommendations of the Gen. silage: "The governing group of these organisations, at central and provincial level, as well as at basic levels, must be operationally mastered by us".
However, there may be reverse situations. The Lithuanian Sajudis was organized by the KGB for the purposes of the "perestroika", but in time any confiscationists were exposed, others died and now the organization serves the Lithuanians well. Is the Confederacy similar?
There are opinions that this organization was created as 3 separate projects to take votes from Kaczyński. Later, due to seismic arithmetic, projects were merged and the organization got into the Sejm by introducing 11 MPs (2019). There has been a permanent division of the independency environment.
The emergence of fresh structures and the request to "residence" many levels of organization hierarchy is an chance to free human energy and an chance to act for ideological people. That is why there are many capable activists and sincere patriots in the Confederacy calling themselves 'idea' or 'real right' to separate themselves from 'writers'. Young, energetic and proposing simple solutions to hard problems, Confederates are in a comfortable position as reviewers of political competition. The most perfect conservative voters think that the Confederacy better fulfills their expectations, due to the fact that it is more radical, more patriotic, more spiritual than the PiS. That is why we are seeing a steady outflow of PiS voters to the Confederation, which is closely followed.
Confederates as a full preach inconsistent views due to the fact that leaders of individual groups seem to have their individual programs. They are not only contradictory, but even exclusive (how do you reconcile orthodox Catholicism with turboliberalism?).
Among the "guru" libertarian is Ayn Rand, who in the book "The Virtue of Selfishness" approves of egoism as a force liberating human energy, at the same time stigmatizing the oppressive initiative and demoralizing altruism (not to mention "distribution").
The chief ideologist of the Korwin–Mikke Confederation is an opponent of social policy, assuming that capable and resourceful people can cope with life (and the weak and helpless are to go "to a tree"? It is not hard to announcement that the ideas of theorists of utmost liberalism are in fundamental contradiction with Catholic social discipline ("one second burden of wear" – St. Paul).
There's quite a few contradictions in liberal narrative. For example, they believe that the government should favour entrepreneurs – manufacturers, due to the fact that they produce goods and pay taxes that others only "overeat." In fact, producers and consumers are intertwined in a deadly - love relation - it is not possible for producers without purchasing power of consumers (though 1 from "republication").
Grzegorz Braun, a monarchist, proclaiming that he “does not want to be a citizen, but a subject”, a friendly-looking manager of interesting films, gives interviews to post-Soviet media and is photographed in Moscow, Red Square in the company of Swiridov, an agent registered as a journalist. We know akin situations from history, as described by a Russian MP in a study to the Tsar: 'Massalsky's hope that with our aid strong can make bias, has given it into our hands'.
The politician fights the country's “Ukraine” and has been the first to break the taboo in 80 years, indicating the excessive (in his opinion) privileged judaic number in Poland. These themes make considerable social resonance and as a “programme locomotive” they are the origin of the success of his group. The most dangerous part of Braun's program, straight hitting our security, is the criticism of the presence of “American business troops” in Poland. For many of us, “occupational” American troops are not bad, due to the fact that we like to live under “American occupation” than any other. Those who do not like the function of America as a planet gendarme should realize that without America another gendarme will appear, surely worse.
A common "programming minimum" of Confederate leaders can be brought to respective points – a reluctance to pay taxes and an extended "social state", the request for bureaucracy ("officials overeat our money"), a dissension to socialism that supposedly wants to introduce the Law and the harm of an alliance with the US due to the fact that "we should have our own strong army" (how to build it with residual taxes?).
Confederates see threats from Germany, the EU, the US, Ukrainians and Jews, tactfully ignoring the Russian direction.
Furthermore, "freedoms" do not like the "change of kneelers" from Berlin and Brussels to Washington. In their opinion, an "exotic" alliance with a "away country" does not warrant security. We must look for allies closer. We should so step out of the European Union and NATO, and alternatively of "hanging" on an alliance with the US – run a "multi-point" policy (?).
While acting in the same independent "market segment", the PiS and the Confederacy are competitors and besides possible coalitions, the hopes of a coalition are questionable. Parliamentary votes on immunity Błaszczak and the candidate for RPO Borowski, as well as the statements of the Confederacy MPs, indicate that they are closer to the "antiscript" than to the coalition from the Law and Justice. Confederate leaders dispute the achievements of the PiS government, blame Morawiecki Prime Minister for all failures and categorically exclude the anticipation of a coalition involving this policy. The PiS management, seeking closer positions, put another candidate on the front, which became an indirect origin of the divided in the party.
The top success of the combined agents is the permanent division and fragmentation of the independency environment. The mark has been achieved.
